Life cycle assessment of packaged organic dairy product: A comparison of different methods for the environmental assessment of alternative scenarios

Evaluation of environmental performance and selection of the most suitable system for MFCs with different electron acceptors by life cycle assessment and PROMETHEE approach

“…ISO 14040 suggests that the allocation between product and co-products is a breakdown of input and output flows and it should be avoided. 29 Hence, system expansion was used instead of allocation in this study.…”

Which Is More Environmentally Friendly? A Comparative Analysis of the Environmental Benefits of Two Waste-to-Energy Technologies for Plastics Based on an LCA Model

“…The midpoint method was chosen as the environmental impact evaluation method in this study, and the specific operational tool was the Recipe 2016 Midpoint (H) V1.04/World (2010) H model built in the Simapro software, which could cover three endpoint environmental impact categories and 18 midpoint environmental impact categories [37][38][39]. The 18 environmental impact categories covered are shown in Table 3.…”

A Bibliometric and Visualization Review Analysis of Agricultural Ecosystem Services Research

“…Voluntary transactions between providers and users of ecosystem services could not reflect the "fair" value provided by ecosystems (Wunder, 2015), Payment for ecosystem services was advocated widely as a potential solution to pollution problems faced in agricultural production. Research on payment for ecosystem services originated from payment programs for rainforests in Central and South America, and gradually expanded into other fields, including agricultural land conservation programs, organic farming payments, and so on (Jaeck & Lifran, 2014;Accatino et al, 2019;Borghesi et al, 2022). In addition, implementation issues were explored in-depth, such as shareholder or farmer's willingness to accept payments, consumer's willingness to pay for organic or green products, the appropriate level of compensation, and factors affecting participants' behaviors (Atinkut et al, 2020;Choruma & Odume, 2019;Huang et al, 2018;Jaeck & Lifran, 2014;Pouta et al, 2021).…”

“…Among the earliest research on payment for ecosystem services, most focused on forest conservation programs in Central and South America (Alix-Garcia et al, 2012;García, 2011). Scholars then gradually expanded the scope of research to exploring PES of watersheds, arable lands, rangeland, as well as environmentally friendly practices of farmers and agricultural businesses (Jaeck & Lifran, 2014;Accatino et al, 2019;Borghesi et al, 2022).…”

“…In order to tackle the above issue, payment for ecosystem services was suggested by scholars in the hope of incentivizing both parties in protecting the ecosystems. Numbers of researchers have looked into payment for agroecosystem services, such as payment for farmland, grassland, ranches, organic production practices, and so on (Jaeck & Lifran, 2014;Accatino et al, 2019;Borghesi et al, 2022).…”