Life Cycle Assessment of Municipal Solid Waste Management – Comparison of Results Using Different LCA Models

Abstract

LCA is a popular tool widely used to assess the environmental impact of waste management systems, which is illustrated by the substantial number of LCA computer models specifically addressing this subject. Due to the complex nature of waste management modelling and the range of country-specific data, as well as lack of harmonization, it has been observed that there are large discrepancies between the results using different models. Many studies have underlined the necessity of clearly identifying both the scope and methodological assumptions of LCAs in order to have confidence in the results. Therefore, the paper presented here reveals several methodology-related issues. The study tests two different pieces of LCA software, i.e. IWM-2 (designed specifically for MSW) and SimaPro (a generic and widely used LCA software). The pieces of software were used to LCA an MSW scenario and the results obtained (calculated using Ecoindicator'99 H/A) were compared to show the strengths and weaknesses of these tools, i.e., generic software usually treats the waste as a set of separate fractions, not as a whole mass, which means that the software is not highly sensitive to the composition of the waste and does not take into account the environmental impacts produced as a result of the interaction between the waste components after mixing. As waste composition is very important in planning, one study combines these two software packages to get final results, i.e., data generated by IWM-2 were entered into SimaPro. The discussion is built around a case study in Poland where waste management scenarios have been analyzed. The research carried out has shown that having the same initial inventory data collected on the basis of the same assumptions and with the same boundaries to the system model used and using the same method of LCIA to assess the impact on the environment, may not produce the same end results. In the presented study, the main differences in the LCIA results appeared in four output-related impact categories: carcinogens, climate change, ecotoxicity, and eutrophication/acidification, and for one input related impact category -fossil fuels. Four reasons responsible for these differences are identified:(1) The IWM-2 program identified a smaller number of substances emitted to air and water associated with landfill and recycling than the Ecoinvent database (IWM-2 identified a total of 31 types of emissions to air

Valuation of Ecosystem Services for Implementing Innovative Clean Technology

“…The ecosystem service valuation method presented in this article may be further enhanced with a life cycle assessment (LCA) of the technology in question. Such an assessment provides essential insights and identifies flows between the resources used, the energy generated, the products produced, and the emissions released at each stage of the production process [59][60]. LCA is a widelyrecognized quantitative tool for assessing environmental impacts.…”

Introductory Chapter: Municipal Solid Waste

“…Hence, LCA is a well-established tool, which nowadays is widely used to assess the environmental impact of product life cycles ("cradle-to-gate" or "cradle-to-grave"; the first refers only to production until the product leaving the factory's gate, while latter involves also the waste disposal after a product's life span), new technological processes, as well as waste management systems including waste treatment and processes for disposal, recycling, composting, or waste conversion for energy generation (biogas, thermal conversion in cogeneration plants). The evaluation of the existing situation of municipal solid waste management from an environmental, economic, and social perspective via a life cycle approach is an important first step prior to taking any decisions on the technologies to be selected, the policies to be developed, and the strategies to be followed for a nation [16].…”

Tire Industry Products as an Alternative Fuel

“…Although in the founding treaties of the European Communities did not yet mention it [8] 1) and introduced the concept of extended producer responsibility for waste [9]. This directive, like several other EU documents, recommended the use of procedures of life cycle assessment (LCA) [10]. LCA allows for determining the effects of the product on the environment in all phases of its life: from raw materials to production, through the process of production, distribution, and consumption to disposal [11].…”