2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11783-016-0851-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment of low impact development technologies combined with conventional centralized water systems for the City of Atlanta, Georgia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0
8

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(48 reference statements)
1
11
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Though often explored for its contributions to urban aesthetics and public health, urban green infrastructure (GI) also shows promise in enhancing urban resilience, through specifically promoting and enhancing ecosystem services linked to reduced flooding risk, urban heat island reduction, improved air quality, reduced energy consumption in buildings, carbon storage, conservation of wildlife habitat, and the provision of recreation and leisure amenities that improve the wellbeing of urban residents (Pennino, McDonald, and Jaffe 2016;Saleh and Weinstein 2016;Sutton-Grier, Wowk, and Bamford 2015). Given the existing built environment, these will often necessarily be hybrid approaches that combine "green," "blue," and "grey" infrastructures to achieve greater wellbeing benefits and more resilient communities (Jeong et al 2016;Klenzendorf et al 2016;Liu et al 2016), particularly in cities located along the coast (Sutton-Grier, Wowk, and Bamford 2015). Urban GI can therefore be seen as "the creative combination of natural and artificial (green þ grey þ blue) structures intended to achieve specific resilience goals (e.g., flood/drought management, public health, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Though often explored for its contributions to urban aesthetics and public health, urban green infrastructure (GI) also shows promise in enhancing urban resilience, through specifically promoting and enhancing ecosystem services linked to reduced flooding risk, urban heat island reduction, improved air quality, reduced energy consumption in buildings, carbon storage, conservation of wildlife habitat, and the provision of recreation and leisure amenities that improve the wellbeing of urban residents (Pennino, McDonald, and Jaffe 2016;Saleh and Weinstein 2016;Sutton-Grier, Wowk, and Bamford 2015). Given the existing built environment, these will often necessarily be hybrid approaches that combine "green," "blue," and "grey" infrastructures to achieve greater wellbeing benefits and more resilient communities (Jeong et al 2016;Klenzendorf et al 2016;Liu et al 2016), particularly in cities located along the coast (Sutton-Grier, Wowk, and Bamford 2015). Urban GI can therefore be seen as "the creative combination of natural and artificial (green þ grey þ blue) structures intended to achieve specific resilience goals (e.g., flood/drought management, public health, etc.)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Em seguida, foi verificado ainda os países em que os estudos de caso foram realizados. Das 25 pesquisas abordadas, 8 foram estabelecidas nos Estados Unidos (ANAND; APUL, 2011;DEVKOTA et al, 2013;SHAH et al, 2013;GHIMIRE et al, 2014;DEVKOTA;JEONG et al, 2016;GHIMIRE et al, 2017), seguidas da Espanha com 6 trabalhos (ANGRILL et al, 2012;MORALES-PINZÓN et al, 2012;VARGAS-PARRA;VILLALBA;GABARRELL, 2013;MORALES-PINZÓN et al, 2014;MORALES-PINZÓN et al, 2015;ANGRILL et al, 2017). A Figura 8 apresenta os 9 países restantes que foram verificados.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…A Figura 8 apresenta os 9 países restantes que foram verificados. -PINZÓN et al, 2014;RYGAARD et al, 2014;MORALES-PINZÓN et al, 2015;VIALLE et al, 2015;ANGRILL et al, 2017;GAO et al, 2016;JEONG et al, 2016;VALDEZ et al, 2016) e comerciais (CHANG; LEE; YOON, 2017;GHIMIRE et al, 2017). No entanto, a tipologia residencial unifamiliar foi a que teve o maior número de casos analisados na amostra estudada.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…3.1). Wang et al (2017) also highlighted that a bioretention basin displayed the least climate change impact and financial cost for cleaning water, but separate storm systems consumed the least energy for cleaning water (Jeong et al 2016). Hoang and Fenner (2016) also found that GI can actually increase life cycle costs, especially for maintenance and cleaning.…”
Section: Financeability Challengementioning
confidence: 98%