2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-1323(02)00056-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle assessment of energy and environmental implications of the implementation of conservation technologies in school buildings in Mendoza—Argentina

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
54
0
3

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These inputs and outputs of mass and energy as a kind of metabolism result in global change presented by air pollution and huge amount of carbon emissions. According to data from the Worldwatch Institute, building sector annually consumes 40% of the stone, sand and gravel, 25% of the timber (Arena and Rosa, 2003). In the member nations of the European Union, buildings consume approximately 50% of the total energy use and contribute almost 50% of the CO 2 emissions released to the Urban building system assumes significant environmental and ecological implications in terms of a contribution of emissions of CO 2 and other greenhouse gases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These inputs and outputs of mass and energy as a kind of metabolism result in global change presented by air pollution and huge amount of carbon emissions. According to data from the Worldwatch Institute, building sector annually consumes 40% of the stone, sand and gravel, 25% of the timber (Arena and Rosa, 2003). In the member nations of the European Union, buildings consume approximately 50% of the total energy use and contribute almost 50% of the CO 2 emissions released to the Urban building system assumes significant environmental and ecological implications in terms of a contribution of emissions of CO 2 and other greenhouse gases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the building industry has an even larger energy and environmental footprint as it is one of the human activities with the largest environmental impact. As noted by Dixit et al [5], the construction industry depleted two-fifths of global raw stone, gravel, and sand; one-fourth of virgin wood; and it consumes 40 percent of total energy and 16 percent of fresh water annually [6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. These figures are more or less similar in any developed country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…By definition, it is the time after which the EROI reaches a value of one and the net energy is equal to zero. Hence, EROI over the life time is: (6) This brings the issue of the lifetime of components [32][33][34] and of the building itself, which are in general poorly defined. To handle this problem, it is often recommended to refer to the norm ISO 15686 Buildings and constructed assets service-life planning [35] or using a 50 years timeframe as a reference for major renovations, since it is acknowledged and used in many studies [36].…”
Section: The Energy Payback Time (Ept)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it also responsible for the massive impact on the environment due to natural resource consumption and emission released [1]. Roodman et al [2] suggested that buildings are responsible for world's fresh water withdrawals, wood harvest and material and energy flow that consist of 17%, 25%, and 40%, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%