Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: A review

Wang, Yan; Pan, Zhejun; Zhang, Wenxiang; Borhani, Tohid N.; Rui, Li; Zhang, Zhien

doi:10.1016/j.envres.2021.112219

Cited by 57 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 87 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The addition of CCS with the steam reforming of natural gas into hydrogen reduced GWP by 45-85%, while other impacts slightly increased (8,102). The authors noted that at 20-60% increased production cost of hydrogen, 55-90% of CO 2 of the plant can be captured (102).…”

Section: Environmental Economic and Societal Impactsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospects of carbon capture, utilization and storage for mitigating climate change

Roy

Mohanty

Misra

2023

Environ. Sci.: Adv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Environmental Economic and Societal Impactsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Prospects of carbon capture, utilization and storage for mitigating climate change

Roy

Mohanty

Misra

2023

Environ. Sci.: Adv.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…However, the current study has not considered leakage monitoring as it has a negligible environmental impact. 48,49…”

Section: Indian Scenario For Ccs-case Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…After CO 2 injection, leakage monitoring is required at the site for potential leakage of CO 2 . However, the current study has not considered leakage monitoring as it has a negligible environmental impact 48,49 …”

Section: Indian Scenario For Ccs‐ Case Studymentioning

confidence: 99%

Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage in saline aquifers for coal‐fired power generation: An Indian scenario

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Human activity is causing an increase in the atmospheric concentration of greenhouse gases (GHGs) resulting in global climate change. The use of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in energy supply systems is one method of reducing GHG emissions. Three pulverized coal‐fired power stations near the Krishna–Godavari basin with and without CCS have been evaluated using the life cycle assessment and economical approach. Mono‐ethanolamine (MEA) postcombustion CO2 capture, compression, transportation with the pipeline, and storage in the Krishna–Godavari basin are all part of the CCS system. Up to 89% of power plants’ CO2 emissions can potentially be reduced. The retrofitting of a CO2 capture unit into a power plant adds the most to emissions and the cost of the CCS system. There is a 66% rise in the electricity cost when CCS is implemented in an existing power station, with a capital cost of about US$3.4billion. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

“…Based on our analysis requirement, one of the methodologies is selected to interpret the results. (iv) Lastly, the results obtained after LCIA are summarized and compared with the alternatives 31 . Using this methodology, we have compared environmental impact of AC production and gas storage using a life cycle assessment.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Life cycle assessment as a comparison tool for activated carbon preparations and biomethane storage for vehicular applications

Adlak

Chandra

Kumar

et al. 2022

Intl J of Energy Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The term "future material" is referred for activated carbons (AC) due to their easy/scalable preparation, compatible property, and numerous applications. The applications of such materials for gas adsorption and storage play a vital role in the large-scale feasibility of adsorbed gas storage. This could provide a better alternative to compression-based storage for vehicular applications due to lower energy and materials input. Currently, compression-based storage has been thoroughly studied and widely used; however, there are limited reports on LCA. In this paper, a lifecycle-based approach has been deployed for chemically activated carbon (CAC) production using KOH and compared with inventory-based physically activated carbon (PAC). The PACs have a far lesser impact than the CACs mainly owing to the chemicals used. Potassium hydroxide and electricity account for nearly 70 to 90% of different ecotoxicity indicators. It has also been estimated that if by-products generated using chemicals are recovered, the mid-

show abstract

Life cycle assessment of combustion-based electricity generation technologies integrated with carbon capture and storage: A review

Cited by 57 publications

References 87 publications

Prospects of carbon capture, utilization and storage for mitigating climate change

Prospects of carbon capture, utilization and storage for mitigating climate change

Life cycle assessment of carbon capture and storage in saline aquifers for coal‐fired power generation: An Indian scenario

Life cycle assessment as a comparison tool for activated carbon preparations and biomethane storage for vehicular applications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About