Life Cycle Assessment (Lca) of Municipal Solid Waste Management Systems in Cluj County, Romania

Abstract

Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a methodology that can be used to evaluate the environmental performance of municipal solid waste management systems (MSWMS). Despite of Waste Directive provisions, this methodology is insufficiently applied as a decision-support method able to identify the best option for the waste management in Romania. In this paper we applied LCA methodology to study of the municipal waste management system of Cluj County, supported by GaBi software. The aim of this study is to identify the most environmentally friendly waste management scenario. To fulfill this goal, four different MSWMS scenarios have been developed and applied for Cluj County. Scenario #1 represents the current MSW management status in the area of concern, involving the commingled collection systems, transportation and landfilling, while in case of the second Scenario assumes the inclusion of composting, which is applied for the wet part of the MSW, in order to obtain a similar product as the compost (SPC). The quality of SPC is not so good, but the product can be used at least as covering material for landfill rehabilitation (the existing old landfills) or other contaminated areas such as forests, mines, quarries. Scenario #3 integrates the recycling options for the recyclable materials. In Scenario #4 incineration was added for the residual waste defined as "other waste" (household hazardous waste). The Life Cycle Inventory analysis was carried out by using the GaBi4 software. The environmental impacts of these four scenarios were analyzed with respect to the global warming potential (the highest value was 9.34E+20 kg equiv. CO2 for Scenario 1 and the lowest value was -1.44E+21 kg equiv. CO2 for Scenario 4, the negative value reflecting an avoided impact on the environment), acidification potential (the highest value was 2.68E+15 kg equiv. SO2 for Scenario 1 and the lowest value was -9.63E+16 for the Scenario 4), eutrophication potential (the highest value was 6.30E+14 kg equiv. PO4 for Scenario 4 and the lowest value was 1.60E+14 kg equiv. PO4 for Scenario 1), human toxicity potential (the highest value was 4.26E+08 kg equiv. DCB for Scenario 1 and the lowest value was -2.00E+11 kg equiv. DCB for Scenario 4), freshwater aquatic ecotoxicity potential (the highest value was 9.86E+05 kg equiv. DCB and the lowest value was -2.00E+11 kg equiv. DCB) and photochemical ozone creation potential (the highest value was 1.57E+15 kg equiv. ethene and the lowest value was -7.50E+16 kg equiv. ethene). The results revealed that Scenario #4 can be identified as the most environmentally friendly one, due to the good results regarding all environmental impacts and higher energy recovery (1.90E+09 MJ for Scenario 4 compared to 7.78E+07 MJ for Scenario 2). In all scenarios, the generated impact for the global warming category has a dominant contribution and the impact on eutrophication potential play an important role. In this study the waste management scenarios were investigated only by the environmental point of view and for the ec...

Impacts of COVID-19 Outbreak on the Municipal Solid Waste Management: Now and beyond the Pandemic

“…The inclusion of incineration with composting of the wet organic portion and recycling of the recyclable portion was environmentally preferable. 89 On the other hand, anaerobic digestion of organic waste was preferred compared to composting. 65 …”

“…A wide range of environmental impacts is reported for different waste management systems (Table ). These variations resulted from the composition of the waste stream, type of waste, management systems, energy recovery system, system boundary, sources of energy used in the waste management processes, etc. , For example, in China, electricity from coal-fired power plants is used in waste management, whereas in Brazil, electricity from hydropower is used, and thus the same two waste management technologies using the same amount of electricity would have different environmental impacts because of the energy source . The environmental impact of MSW also depends on the method of disposal. , For example, incineration and landfilling produces 0.53 tonne CO 2 equiv and 10.84 tonne CO 2 equiv per tonne of MSW, respectively .…”

“…The environmental impacts of waste management were reported to be the highest for uncontrolled landfilling of MSW and the lowest for incineration of the residual portion of MSW, with the remainder going to landfills. The inclusion of incineration with composting of the wet organic portion and recycling of the recyclable portion was environmentally preferable . On the other hand, anaerobic digestion of organic waste was preferred compared to composting …”

Carbon Footprint of Dwelling Construction in Romania and Spain. A Comparative Analysis with the OERCO2 Tool

“…The tools used by Romanian evaluators to calculate CO 2 emissions of buildings are One Click LCA, Integrated Environmental Solution (IES VE Pro) [42], GaBi [43], 360 Optimi [44], and others. All of these require data on the type of material, the name of the product, thickness, quantity, transport (distance and type), and durability.…”

“…The project aimed to achieve a Gold Level certification [45]. GaBi software [43] supported a study on the LCA methodology applied to optimize municipal solid waste management (MSW) systems in Cluj county, Romania.…”