2017
DOI: 10.3390/su9101864
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life-Cycle Assessment: A Comparison between Two Optimal Post-Tensioned Concrete Box-Girder Road Bridges

Abstract: Abstract:The goal of sustainability involves a consensus among economic, environmental and social factors. Due to climate change, environmental concerns have increased in society. The construction sector is among the most active high environmental impact sectors. This paper proposes new features to consider a more detailed life-cycle assessment (LCA) of reinforced or pre-stressed concrete structures. Besides, this study carries out a comparison between two optimal post-tensioned concrete box-girder road bridge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…FU was 1 m 2 of construction with a service life 100 years. Another different approach to the assessment of the End of life phase was investigated by Penades-Pla [89].…”
Section: Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FU was 1 m 2 of construction with a service life 100 years. Another different approach to the assessment of the End of life phase was investigated by Penades-Pla [89].…”
Section: Transportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general terms, there is the need of refined decision-making approaches in order to use a rational approach in the selection of the optimal restoration strategy accounting for all the different economic, social and environmental aspects. Penadés-Plà et al (2017) presented an interesting review of previous literature studies dealing with the implementation of methods based on the Multiple-Attribute-Decision-Making (MADM) for a sustainable bridge design: among others, scoring methods (Podvezko, 2011), distance-based methods (Tamiza et al, 1998;Ballestero, 2007), pairwise comparison approaches like analytic hierarchy/network processes (Gorener, 2012;Ali et al, 2015;Rashidi et al, 2016), outranking methods (Behzadian et al, 2010;Govindan and Jepsen, 2016;Jajac et al, 2017), multi-attribute utility/value theory (Sarabando and Dias, 2010;Sabatino et al, 2015) can be viable solutions for a rational decision-making process. Recently Yoon and Hastak (2017) presented a multitiered prioritizing method based on urgency scales able to take into account two hierarchical selection steps based on urgency and total prioritization scales.…”
Section: Decision-making With Different Types Of Pismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 considers the prefabrication process for PRC components and demonstrates three stages of the cradle-to-site life cycle (materials preparation stage, transportation stage, and on-site construction stage) for a high-rise building. Some studies replace the "materials preparation" by the term "manufacturing", such as the work by Penadés-Plà et al [35], but the concept is the same. and it is an effective solution for minimising the environmental impact.…”
Section: Lca Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%