Life Cycle Approach: A Critical Review in the Tourism Sector

Arcese, Gabriella; Lucchetti, Maria Claudia; Merli, Roberto

doi:10.3390/wsf3-a007

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 24 publications

(20 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…However, challenges remain as comprehensive category sets as well as well-defined impact pathways for all three tiers are missing in the case of both SLCA and LCC. Moreover, at the interpretation phase, challenges occur due to the potential trade-off of the results between and within the three sustainability dimensions (Zamagni et al 2013;Arcese et al 2013). In the case studies described above, those trade-offs were displayed transparently for each dimension in the Tiered Approach without giving weights.…”

Section: Research Needs and Outlookmentioning

confidence: 99%

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Approaches for Manufacturing

Chang

Neugebauer

Lehmann

et al. 2017

Sustainable Manufacturing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sustainability assessments considering the three dimensions environment, economy, and society are needed to evaluate manufacturing processes and products with regard to their sustainability performance. This chapter focuses on Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment (LCSA), which considers all three sustainability dimensions by combining the three methods Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Life Cycle Costing (LCC), and Social Life Cycle Assessment (SLCA). Existing LCSA approaches as well as selected ongoing work are introduced, both regarding the individual approaches as well as the combined LCSA approach. This includes, for instance, the Tiered Approach. This approach facilitates the implementation of LCSA, for instance, within the manufacturing sector, by providing a category hierarchy and guiding practitioners through the various impact and cost categories proposed for the three methods. Furthermore, ongoing developments in LCC and SLCA are presented, such as the definition of first economic and social impact pathways (linking fair wage and level of education to social damage levels) for addressing the current challenges of missing impact pathways for economic and social aspects. In addition, the Sustainability Safeguard Star suggests a new scheme for addressing the inter-linkages between the three sustainability dimensions. These approaches foster the application and implementation of LCSA and thus contribute to developing sustainable processes and products.

show abstract

Section: Research Needs and Outlookmentioning

confidence: 99%

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Approaches for Manufacturing

Chang

Neugebauer

Lehmann

et al. 2017

Sustainable Manufacturing

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Therewith, the representation of results within LCSA can be seen as another challenge (Ingwersen et al, 2014), as the interpretation of gathered results for the three methods goes beyond the complexity of LCA studies (Cinelli et al, 2013). Therefore, trade-offs between the dimensions must be identified with the utmost care and results must be displayed separately for each dimension (Arcese et al, 2013;Hunkeler and Rebitzer, 2005;Valdivia et al, 2012;Zamagni et al, 2013).…”

Section: Life Cycle Sustainability Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 98%

Enhancing the practical implementation of life cycle sustainability assessment – proposal of a Tiered approach

Neugebauer

Martínez-Blanco

Scheumann

et al. 2015

Journal of Cleaner Production

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Beberapa di antaranya ditunjukkan pada Kitamura dkk (2020) yang memperlihatkan jejak karbon yang dihasilkan dari kegiatan pariwisata di Jepang sebesar 136 Juta ton CO 2 per tahun di mana kontribusi terbesar (56,3%) dihasilkan dari tahapan transportasi para wisatawan [13], Cremer dkk (2021) menunjukkan bagaimana penilaian daur hidup digunakan di Kota Vienna sehingga terindikasi bahwa 47% dari total emisi GRK adalah di luar batas tanggung jawab langsung pemerintah Kota Vienna [14]. Selain itu beberapa publikasi yang ditemukan menampilkan kerangka kajian penilaian daur hidup terkait dengan pariwisata berkelanjutan [15], [16], [17], dan proyek perkotaan [18]. Berdasarkan ulasan sebelumnya maka belum pernah dilakukan studi penilaian daur hidup pada sebuah fasilitas agro-eduwisata sehingga studi ini perlu dilakukan untuk mengisi celah (filling the gap) dari studi penilaian daur hidup yang ada saat ini.…”

Section: Pengantarunclassified

Jejak karbon pada tahap operasional agro-eduwisata kota mataram menggunakan pendekatan penilaian daur hidup

Adiansyah

2022

teknosains

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Climate change is one of the global issues that require the participation of all stakeholders for handling. In addition, the climate change issue is listed as one of the sustainable development goals (SDGs). The Government of Mataram city, as one of the stakeholders, has committed to involve the climate change consideration into its planned program, including the development of agro-edutourism facility. This study aims to calculate a carbon footprint of agroedutourism facility during the operational stage in order to implement the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emission reduction strategy. The method used is a life cycle assessment approach with ReCiPe analysis, and the functional unit is an annual carbon footprint per m2 area of agro-edutourism. The study showed that the total carbon footprint per m2 was 2.88 KgCO2-e per annum with the primary environmental hotspot was fossil fuel utilization in energy source of agro-edutourism facility (Electricity State-own Company) and visitor vehicles. Therefore, some strategies could be applied for reducing the carbon footprint, such as increasing the utilization percentage of renewable energy (solar panel), using energy-saving bulbs, preparing the facilities for zero-emission vehicles, and applying the green building concept or design. Further research is required to assess the energy management concept from the technical feasibility aspect and economic aspect for complimenting this study.

show abstract

Life Cycle Approach: A Critical Review in the Tourism Sector

Cited by 4 publications

References 24 publications

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Approaches for Manufacturing

Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment Approaches for Manufacturing

Enhancing the practical implementation of life cycle sustainability assessment – proposal of a Tiered approach

Jejak karbon pada tahap operasional agro-eduwisata kota mataram menggunakan pendekatan penilaian daur hidup

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About