2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Life cycle analyses of CO2, energy, and cost for four different routes of microalgal bioenergy conversion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
45
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A recent study that analysed four methods of microalgal bioenergy production found that anaerobic digestion produces more net energy than supercritical gasification, the latter requiring higher energy input and having a negative return on energy investment [122,169]. This conclusion is supported by a related study that has demonstrated that anaerobic digestion of "algal residues" can have a higher net energy return and much lower GHG emissions than gasification [170].…”
Section: Anaerobic Digestionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…A recent study that analysed four methods of microalgal bioenergy production found that anaerobic digestion produces more net energy than supercritical gasification, the latter requiring higher energy input and having a negative return on energy investment [122,169]. This conclusion is supported by a related study that has demonstrated that anaerobic digestion of "algal residues" can have a higher net energy return and much lower GHG emissions than gasification [170].…”
Section: Anaerobic Digestionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Both gasification and anaerobic digestion have been suggested as promising methods for exploiting bioenergy from biomass in India [97]. A recent study analysed four methods of microalgal bioenergy production and concluded that supercritical gasification produced more net energy than that from anaerobic digestion [98]. However, following subsequent correction of errors in these calculations (acknowledged by the author in a private communication in 2014), it can be estimated that anaerobic digestion produces more net energy than supercritical gasification, the latter requiring higher energy input and hence giving a negative return on energy investment.…”
Section: Gasificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These chemical conversion processes require a high temperature (60-80°C) in the presence of alcohols (Li et al, 2011), which are high in cost and energy consumption. It has been estimated that for algal biodiesel production, about 15% of energy is used for oil conversion into FAMEs (Ventura et al, 2013). Moreover, toxic waste solvents and alkaline wastewater will be generated through chemical conversion when using alkali catalysts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%