Lietuvių kalbos mokytojai standartinės kalbos ideologijos nelaisvėje: nuostatos, praktikos, pasekmės

Keturkienė, Miglė; Vaicekauskienė, Loreta

doi:10.7220/2335-8769.65.2

Cited by 4 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 6 publications

(8 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…L. Vaicekauskienės (2011) tyrime taip pat atskleista, kad profesionalūs žurnalistai dažniau negu neprofesionalai (t. y. nebaigę žurnalistikos studijų) mato poreikį keisti kalbos kodą ir prisiderinti prie adresato. 2016 metais tirtas lietuvių kalbos ir literatūros mokytojų požiūris į skirtingas lietuvių kalbos atmainas -bendrinę kalbą, tarmes ir jaunimo kalbą (Keturkienė, Vaicekauskienė 2016) 2 . Nustatyta, kad lietuvių kalbos ir literatūros mokytojai pritaria standartinei kalbos ideologijai, ryški mokytojų galios pozicija.…”

Section: įVadasunclassified

Language Editors: Job Prestige, Influence on Language and Perceived Threats

Jakaitė-Bulbukienė

Micutaitė

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The object of this work is to analyse Lithuanian language editors‘ self-assessment of their own work, to see how they are influenced by societal attitudes, and to uncover their relationship to Lithuanian language. These aspects help to investigate the linguistic attitudes of Lithuanian language editors. This is analysis of 10 qualitative in-depth semi-structured interviews with Lithuanian language editors. The texts edited by the participants vary in their nature. All informants are women. Nine interviews have been conducted orally and one in writing. The method applied is qualitative content analysis of the interviews. It has been found that the informants of the study feel that there are critical, skeptical attitudes towards language editors and linguists in general in the public sphere. Editors also often hear inaccurate assessments of their profession from inner cycle. However, most of them do not take such attitudes seriously and do their work without taking them into account. It has been found that most of the informants feel that they contribute to the development of the Lithuanian language and that they influence the language. This is because even editors with extensive editing experience are constantly confronted with new phenomena. Most of the informants of this study have told they can edit freely, are trusted by clients or writers, and are not constrained making their decisions. Editors have also answered that they have a mission to enrich and purify language. A small number of informants of the study have told that they do not see themselves as language creators, but only as executors of the already established language policy. Some editors have indicated they want to stop the influence of English to Lithuanian, while others believe that the influence of other languages is a natural phenomenon, and stress that the language is impoverished by an excessive desire to purify it.

show abstract

Section: įVadasunclassified

Language Editors: Job Prestige, Influence on Language and Perceived Threats

Jakaitė-Bulbukienė

Micutaitė

2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Egzistuoja bendras sutarimas, kad ikimokykliniame amžiuje įgyta kalbinė kompetencija nėra pakankama ir taisyklinga, todėl vaikai mokykloje turi būti mokomi savo gimtosios kalbos kanoninių formų -vaikus to išmokyti turi autoritetai, išmanantys gramatikos taisykles, taisyklingas žodžių reikšmes ir tarimą (Milroy 2001: 537). Kaip rodo lietuvių kalbos tyrimai mokyklos kontekste, analizuojant mokytojų nuostatas į lietuvių kalbos atmainasbendrinę kalbą, tarmes, jaunimo kalbą -Lietuvos švietimo sistemoje gaji bendrinės kalbos ideologija, kurią mokytojai reprodukuoja ir įdiegia šios ideologijos hierarchines vertybes mokiniams (Keturkienė, Vaicekauskienė 2016).…”

Section: Kalbos Standartizavimas Ir Taisyklingumasunclassified

The notion of language in language education policy: a comparative analysis of Lithuania and Denmark

Urbonaitė

2017

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The article analyses the notion and ideology of language formed at the state level in Lithuania and Denmark. The aim is to examine the notion of language and the understanding of language functionality conveyed in the documents of language education policy and ideology emerging in them, also the purposes raised for language education. The official language education policy formed by the state exerts direct influence on language teaching at school and on the students’ formation of the notion of language. Therefore, the questions raised in this research are aimed at identifying what is implemented with the official language education policy, how much attention is devoted to developing the students’ communicative, argumentative skills and skills of independent critical thinking, and how much the policy focuses on the advocacy of national ideology and identity. The data of the research includes national language education policy documents which determine the implementation of language policy in the system of education of Lithuania and Denmark. The following aspects have been analysed: language functions as presented in the education policy documents: the communicative function and the function of national identity; the formation of ideology of nationality through language education; the formation of standard language ideology in language education policy; also the students’ linguistic competences to be developed at school. The results have shown that the notion of language emerging in the Lithuanian language education policy documents encompasses ideologies of standard language, language correctness and linguistic nationalism. The main goal of the Lithuanian language teaching is the implementation and strengthening of a single standard language norm and the formation of the notion of language as a protector and disseminator of national identity. However, the aim to develop language as a communicative tool as well as to develop the students’ critical thinking is also identifiable. The main goal of the Danish education policy is the development of the students’ communicative language function, critical-analytical thinking, and the formation of the notion of language as a means of communication, as well as of the notion of linguistic variation.

show abstract

Objektyvusis tarmiškumas: požymiai ir vertė

Aliūkaitė¹

2019

RePhi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

[straipsnis ir santrauka lietuvių kalba; santrauka anglų kalba] Straipsnyje plėtojamas perceptyviosios dialektologijos diskursas – svarstomas objektyviojo tarmiškumo klausimas. Siekis svarstyti objektyviojo tarmiškumo, kaip tarmėtyrinio parametro, klausimą iš esmės yra siekis identifikuoti tas kalbines tarmės artefakto charakteristikas, kurios skiria šį artefaktą nuo kitų stebėjimo artefaktų paprastojo kalbos bendruomenės nario požiūriu. Taigi straipsnyje, remiantis kalbinių nuostatų ir variantų percepcijos duomenimis, plėtojamas iliustruojamasis diskursas, atskleidžiąs objektyviojo tarmiškumo požymius ir vertę iš paprastojo lietuvių kalbos bendruomenės nario perspektyvos. Iš tyrimo duomenų išaiškėja, kad paprastųjų kalbos bendruomenės narių objektyviojo tarmiškumo bruožų sistema aprėpia ir skiriamuosius (pirminius), ir būdinguosius (antrinius), ir blankiuosius (tretinius) tarminius požymius. Tik dažnesni, intensyvesni antrinių (būdingųjų) ir tretinių (blankiųjų) požymių iškilumai horizontaliajame regioninio kalbos variantiškumo kontinuume lemia, kad paprastieji kalbos bendruomenės nariai (re)konstruoja tarmės artefaktą būtent iš pastarųjų.

show abstract

Lietuvių kalbos mokytojai standartinės kalbos ideologijos nelaisvėje: nuostatos, praktikos, pasekmės

Cited by 4 publications

References 6 publications

Language Editors: Job Prestige, Influence on Language and Perceived Threats

Language Editors: Job Prestige, Influence on Language and Perceived Threats

The notion of language in language education policy: a comparative analysis of Lithuania and Denmark

Objektyvusis tarmiškumas: požymiai ir vertė

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About