In the equity markets the stock price volatility increases as the stock price declines. The classical Black−Scholes−Merton (BSM) option pricing model does not reconcile with this association. Cox introduced the constant elasticity of variance (CEV) model in 1975, in order to capture this inverse relationship between the stock price and its volatility. An important parameter in the model is the parameter β, the elasticity of volatility. The CEV model subsumes some of the previous option pricing models. For β = 0, β = −1/2, and β = −1 the CEV model reduces respectively to the BSM model, the square−root model of Cox and Ross, and the Bachelier model. Both in the case of the BSM model and in the case of the CEV model it has become traditional to begin a discussion of option pricing by starting with the vanilla European calls and puts. The pricing formulas for these financial instruments give concrete information about the pricing of options only after the employment of some intermediate approximation scheme. However, there are simpler solutions to both models than those pertaining to the standard calls and puts. Mathematically, it makes sense to investigate the simpler cases first. Furthermore we do not allow ourselves to be drawn into any rash generalizations or inferences from the vanilla European case by prematurely focusing on those cases and we obtain concrete information for the pricing of options without needing to introduce any intermediate approximation schemes. In the case of BSM model simpler solutions are the log and power solutions. These contracts, despite the simplicity of their mathematical description, are attracting increasing attention as a trading instrument. Similar simple solutions have not been studied so far in a systematic fashion for the CEV model. We use Kovacic's algorithm to derive, for all half−integer values of β, all solutions "in quadratures" of the CEV ordinary differential equation. These solutions give rise, by separation of variables, 1 emelas@econ.uoa.gr to simple solutions to the CEV partial differential equation. In particular, when β = ..., − 5 2 , −2, − 3 2 , −1, 1, 3 2 , 2, 5 2 , ..., we obtain four classes of of denumerably infinite elementary function solutions, when β = − 1 2 and β = 1 2 we obtain two classes of of denumerably infinite elementary function solutions, whereas, when β = 0 we find two elementary function solutions. In the derived solutions we have also dispensed with the unnecessary assumption made in the the BSM model asserting that the underlying asset pays no dividends during the life of the option.