Fourth International Conference on Remote Sensing and Geoinformation of the Environment (RSCy2016) 2016
DOI: 10.1117/12.2240475
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LIDAR vs dense image matching point clouds in complex urban scenes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Two datasets from ALS were taken as reference data. Similar work taking laser scanning data as reference can also be found in (Poon et al 2005;Kraus et al, 2006;Gehrke et al, 2008;Moussa et al, 2013;Remondino et al 2014;Nex et al, 2015;Jaud et al, 2016;Maltezos et al, 2016;Sofia et al, 2016;Ressl et al 2016).…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two datasets from ALS were taken as reference data. Similar work taking laser scanning data as reference can also be found in (Poon et al 2005;Kraus et al, 2006;Gehrke et al, 2008;Moussa et al, 2013;Remondino et al 2014;Nex et al, 2015;Jaud et al, 2016;Maltezos et al, 2016;Sofia et al, 2016;Ressl et al 2016).…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Airborne laser scanning (ALS) and photogrammetry are two main techniques to obtain 3D data representing the surface of the terrain (Höhle and Höhle, 2009). Compared with airborne laser scanning, image acquisition in photogrammetry is mostly cheaper and more efficient in data acquisition flights (Hobi and Ginzler, 2012;Nurminen et al, 2013;Maltezos et al 2016). In many countries photogrammetric image blocks are captured anyway for administrative and planning purposes with decreasing time intervals, so the question is to what extent these data can be used to replace ALS data in various application domains such as Digital Terrain Model (DTM) acquisition (Ressl et al, 2016), forestry mapping (Mura et al, 2015), classification and object extraction (Tomljenovic et al, 2016;Dong et al, 2017), and 3D modeling (Xiong et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several state of the art frameworks can be found in literature that enable automatic initiation of NG112 call [29][30]. Such frameworks can fully contribute to critical infrastructure monitoring and buildings in complex urban scenes [31][32]. In detail, the SB112 components are a sensor node and a gateway.…”
Section: B Sb112mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), the image-based approach is a passive, pixel-wise, low-cost technology for obtaining the 3D structure of a scene that has a higher density and a finer topography. In difficult matching areas, such as shadows, low textures, and repeated textures, the image-based approach is often inaccurate, while LiDAR point clouds respond better in the above areas (Maltezos et al, 2016). Therefore, the complementary data fusion of LiDAR data and image data is a promising solution for generating dense, accurate, texture-rich point clouds (Huang et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%