2022
DOI: 10.1063/5.0087691
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LIDAR for heliostat optical error assessment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many methods have been developed for heliostat metrology, generally in two categories: (1) methods that use diffuse targets, and (2) methods that use specular reflection from the mirrors (which we refer to as deflectometry). Methods relying on diffuse (non-specular) targets include laser tracking, 5,6 3D photogrammetry, 7,8 and radar. 9 These methods measure target positions in 3D, from which surface slopes are estimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many methods have been developed for heliostat metrology, generally in two categories: (1) methods that use diffuse targets, and (2) methods that use specular reflection from the mirrors (which we refer to as deflectometry). Methods relying on diffuse (non-specular) targets include laser tracking, 5,6 3D photogrammetry, 7,8 and radar. 9 These methods measure target positions in 3D, from which surface slopes are estimated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective and efficient field inspection technology for CSP plant is necessary for various applications such as efficient control, maintenance, and repair. Currently the inspection of CSP systems relies on conventional imaging techniques [1], deflectometry [2], flux mapping [3], machine vision [4], and LIDAR scanning [5]. These state-of-art heliostat inspection technologies have different limitations in terms of accuracy, speed, complexity, or cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%