Original ArticleIntroduction H ernia repair is a commonly performed procedure in the world. Several methods have been developed over the years to improve on the traditional methods of hernia repair, the most important being the Lichtenstein mesh repair [1][2][3] and laparoscopic mesh repair [3,4]. The aim of this trial was to determine if, in the hands of an average surgeon and residents, there were any benefits to be gained from using the mesh repair as opposed to the commonly used modified Bassini repair. A controlled randomized prospective study was carried out to compare the recurrence rate, postoperative pain, infection rate, seroma formation, and funiculitis with associated morbidity and hospital stay in patients in whom Bassini and Lichtenstein method of repair was carried out.
Material and MethodsA prospective study was conducted on the patients reporting to Command Hospital (Southern Command) Pune for inguinal hernia. A total of 196 patients were included in the study and operated upon over a period of 24 months. Children up to 18 years of age, patients staying outside Maharashtra, those operated in emergency or suffering from malignant disease, and patients not consenting to participate in the study were excluded. The study was randomized using envelopes containing pieces of paper on which 'Bassini' or 'Lichtenstein'was written. The envelopes were selected on the last visit of the patient to the OPD or immediately on admission to the ward by a person not involved in the study. The patient was explained the nature of surgery and consent for the same was taken. Patients refusing to consent were excluded and their envelopes destroyed. The surgeons and the persons carrying out postoperative assessment, being part of the same surgical team, were not blind to the procedure. All the Bassini repairs were done either under spinal or general anaesthesia while the Lichtenstein's repair was done under local/spinal/general anaesthesia, depending on the choice of the patient and surgeon.