2017
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lichen planus triggered by CT ‐P13 and recurrence during secukinumab treatment

Abstract: (ALCANZA) : an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3, multicentre trial. Lancet 2017; 390:550-66 Funding sources: none.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, TNF blockade is well established for the treatment of PSO but is of no reproducible benefit in CLP. Anti‐TNF‐α blockade has even been reported to induce paradoxical manifestation of LP eruptions in skin and mucosa of single patients 31,32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, TNF blockade is well established for the treatment of PSO but is of no reproducible benefit in CLP. Anti‐TNF‐α blockade has even been reported to induce paradoxical manifestation of LP eruptions in skin and mucosa of single patients 31,32 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, we reported a case of oral lichen planus triggered by infliximab-biosimilar CT-P13 that recurred when the patient was switched to SEK 2 . In our case, we did not observed a concomitant candida infection; however, during SEK treatment, the lichenoid eruption extended to the arms, trunk, and legs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 45%
“…Reported skin related adverse events from phase 3 trials of secukinumab for psoriasis include oral herpes, urticaria, tinea pedis, oral candidiasis, and impetigo, though case reports of other cutaneous reactions have been reported (Table 1), [4,[6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. The Naranjo score is a tool that can help determine the likelihood that a medication in question is responsible for the adverse reaction, which in this case is three (Table 2), [19].…”
Section: Case Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%