2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2006.03.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lichen and bryophyte distribution on oak in London in relation to air pollution and bark acidity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
53
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our methods are not an exact match with any previous CLE studies. Also, several species-focused studies highlight the individuality of species' responses to N pollutants (e.g., Davies et al 2007, Larsen et al 2007, McCune and Geiser 2009) and so potentially different eutrophs differ in their tolerances to different N pollutants. Moreover, it may well be that the NH 3 -specificity of a eutroph index is conditional, arising when available substrates are acidic (see Oak bole pH, below).…”
Section: Deposition Vs Gas Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our methods are not an exact match with any previous CLE studies. Also, several species-focused studies highlight the individuality of species' responses to N pollutants (e.g., Davies et al 2007, Larsen et al 2007, McCune and Geiser 2009) and so potentially different eutrophs differ in their tolerances to different N pollutants. Moreover, it may well be that the NH 3 -specificity of a eutroph index is conditional, arising when available substrates are acidic (see Oak bole pH, below).…”
Section: Deposition Vs Gas Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…N deposition alters bark pH which is known to influence epiphytic communities [29], [30]. The relationship between lower plant frequency and bark pH confirmed that pH was an important driver for the distribution of lichens and bryophytes [30]. As the ammonia alters the bark pH, this process provides a better surrounding for algal growth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…The pH of bark is a sensitive factor responding to relatively small changes in the habitat acidification [28]. N deposition alters bark pH which is known to influence epiphytic communities [29], [30]. The relationship between lower plant frequency and bark pH confirmed that pH was an important driver for the distribution of lichens and bryophytes [30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Brazil, there is only a record of host trees in mangrove regions (Marcelli 1992), while for trees from native Araucaria forests, Pinus and Eucalyptus monocultures, so far almost no data has been published (but see Kaffer et al 2009). In regions of Europe and North America, studies indicate that conifers usually have low pH, with variations between 3.0 and 6.0 (Hale 1983;Sillet et al 2000a;Kermit & Gauslaa 2001;Löbel et al 2006;Wolseley et al 2006;Larsen et al 2007). For the FLONA areas, individuals from the same species, as for example, A. angustifolia, Pinus taeda and P. elliottii and from the same genus, as Eucalyptus sp.…”
Section: Sticta Weigelii Xmentioning
confidence: 99%