Abstract. Epiphytic lichen communities are highly sensitive to excess nitrogen (N), which causes the replacement of native floras by N-tolerant, ''weedy'' eutrophic species. This shift is commonly used as the indicator of ecosystem ''harm'' in studies developing empirical critical levels (CLE) for ammonia (NH 3 ) and critical loads (CLO) for N. To be most effective, empirical CLE and/or CLO must firmly link lichen response to causal pollutant(s), which is difficult to accomplish in field studies in part because the high cost of N measurements limits their use. For this case study we synthesized an unprecedented array of atmospheric N measurements across 22 long-term monitoring sites in the Los Angeles Basin, California, USA: gas concentrations of NH 3 , nitric acid (HNO 3 ), nitrogen dioxide, and ozone (n ¼ 10 sites); N deposition in throughfall (n ¼ 8 sites); modeled estimates of eight different forms of N (n ¼ 22 sites); and nitrate deposition accumulated on oak twigs (n ¼ 22 sites). We sampled lichens on black oak (Quercus kelloggii Newb.), and scored plots using two indices of eutroph (N tolerant species) abundance to characterize the community-level response to N. Our results contradict two common assertions about the lichen-N response: (1) that eutrophs respond specifically to NH 3 and (2) that the response necessarily depends upon the increased pH of lichen substrates. Eutroph abundance related significantly but weakly to NH 3 (r 2 ¼ 0.48). Total N deposition as measured in canopy throughfall was by far the best predictor of eutroph abundance (r 2 ¼ 0.94), indicating that eutrophs respond to multiple forms of N. Most N variables had significant correlations to eutroph abundance (r 2 ¼ 0.36-0.62) as well as to each other (r 2 ¼ 0.61-0.98), demonstrating the risk of mistaken causality in CLE/CLO field studies that lack sufficient calibration data. Our data furthermore suggest that eutroph abundance is primarily driven by N inputs, not substrate pH, at least at the high-pH values found in the basin (4.8-6.1). Eutroph abundance correlated negatively with trunk bark pH (r 2 ¼ 0.43), exactly the opposite of virtually all previous studies of eutroph behavior. This correlation probably results because HNO 3 dominates N deposition in our study region.