1999
DOI: 10.5860/lrts.43n2.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Library Gateway: Project Design, Teams and Cycle Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 The study found that most Gateway users did not like to use online help, and when they did, they either did not find it helpful or got lost in the pro cess of using it. This finding is not unique.…”
Section: July 2000mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 The study found that most Gateway users did not like to use online help, and when they did, they either did not find it helpful or got lost in the pro cess of using it. This finding is not unique.…”
Section: July 2000mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inspired by efforts at Cornell University (Calhoun et al, 1999), the University of Iowa, and other institutions ERC members worked out a scheme for organizing and categorizing research tools. During the course of their investigations their thinking moved away from categories based on the librarians' names for tools, such as catalogs, indexes, and abstracts, to categories based on users' tasks or functions such as "find articles" and "find books."…”
Section: Development Of the Gatewaymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The objectives of the Gateway project were to create a unified, identifiable Library Web site; to provide one-stop shopping for information about the Library and its services; to build one database of metadata to connect users to a carefully selected collection of free and proprietary networked resources; and to mainstream and coordinate the processes for database creation and support. Full details of the strategies, staffing, and processes underlying the Gateway's implementation are reported elsewhere [10], as is an evaluation of the Gateway's performance, from a user's perspective [11].…”
Section: The Case Of the Cornell University Library Gatewaymentioning
confidence: 99%