Library as a consortium perspective: A systematic literature review

Pereira, Maria Rosivalda da Silva; Franco, Mário

doi:10.1177/0961000620904754

Cited by 11 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 57 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…We focused on articles written in English between 1990 and 2021 (articles published within this timeframe and early access papers). Following prior literature in sustainability (Bartolacci et al, 2020) and other fields (Pereira & Franco, 2020; Schmitz et al, 2017; Vojíř & Rusek, 2019; Zhang et al, 2017), we used the Web of Science Core Collection database, which is generally considered the most comprehensive source for scholarly work and includes only publications that demonstrate high levels of editorial rigor (Qiu & Lv, 2014; Web of Science Group, 2021), including all impact factor journals (Hahn & Kühnen, 2013). The search was limited to the Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI) and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate governance perspective on environmental reporting: Literature review and future research agenda

Aluchna,

Roszkowska‐Menkes,

Khan

2023

Corp Soc Responsibility Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The last three decades have witnessed substantial growth in the literature exploring the motives and drivers of corporate greening. Extant research analyzing the governance determinants of corporate environmental disclosure provides competing and contrasting results; despite the growing sustainability challenges create an urgent need for effective monitoring and incentive mechanisms to promote corporate transparency and accountability. This warrants further inquiry in the field, yet very few comprehensive reviews have been presented on governance determinants of corporate environmental disclosure. To fill this gap we conduct a systematic review of 121 published papers and distinguish the governance mechanisms fostering corporate environmental disclosure. Our paper identifies factors influencing the adoption, extant, and quality of environmental disclosure, and provides useful future research directions.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Corporate governance perspective on environmental reporting: Literature review and future research agenda

Aluchna,

Roszkowska‐Menkes,

Khan

2023

Corp Soc Responsibility Env

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…During 1998–2008, the number of articles grew relatively flat. From 2008 to 2018, the growth rate of the number of articles started to accelerate, and after 2018, the growth trend was more pronounced, entering the so‐called take‐off phase (Pereira & Franco, 2020). Due to the time frame of the literature collection, the literature count for 2023 is still in progress, so we use a dashed line here.…”

Section: An Overview Of the Collected Literaturementioning

confidence: 99%

Value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices: Literature review and future agenda: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Zhao,

Lian,

Zhang

et al. 2023

Asso for Info Science & Tech

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Value co‐creation as a research topic has been a critical proposition of interest to a wide range of disciplines. In recent years, the field of cultural heritage has also developed a range of information practices to promote different forms of value co‐creation. While the body of literature has begun to accumulate, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of conceptual foundations and how value co‐creation is implemented in cultural heritage information practices. This paper conducted a hermeneutic literature review to understand and conceptualize the core aspects of value co‐creation in various cultural heritage information works. In particular, this paper provides a research mapping of the genres of co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices, the actors, and the roles played by the stakeholders. Further, this review provides an overview of the dominant value co‐creation models in the cultural heritage field. It distills the drivers of value co‐creation and the core value consequences that arise from a process perspective. Finally, this paper puts forward a thematic, theoretical, and methodological agenda for future work based on these findings. The review contributes to the literature by proposing an integrated conceptual framework that summarizes the core elements of value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices. The framework also serves as a call for action, providing a general understanding of the conceptual foundation for future research.

show abstract

“…Using a graph to illustrate the yearly distribution of publications, we identify the evolution of publications over time (Figure 3). According to management and economics researchers Pereira and Franco (2020, p. 1130), the yearly distribution of publications can be divided into an “emergence phase” and a “take-off phase.” In the selected bibliography, we find the emergence phase to be the period from the late 1990s until 2009. In this period, research publications on libraries, sustainability and/or sustainable development were few and scattered, with 1 or 0 publications per year and only 4 publications in total.…”

Section: Research Mappingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Libraries, sustainability and sustainable development: a review of the research literature

Mathiasson

Jochumsen

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeThe purpose of this literature review is to provide an overview of and insights into a selected bibliography of 102 research publications on libraries – of all types – sustainability and sustainable development, including the UN Sustainable Development Goals.Design/methodology/approachThe review procedure is inspired by the hermeneutic literature review method, referring to a circular process of searching, sorting, selecting, acquiring, reading, identifying and refining. The publications are mapped to provide an overview of the research field. Following the research mapping, all publications are categorized as either environmental, economic, social, cultural or holistic according to their usage and understanding of the core concepts of sustainability and sustainable development. Finally, the main rationales behind the core concepts are identified, and their possible implications on the role of libraries and librarians are discussed.FindingsOf the 102 research publications, 45 are categorized as environmental, 9 as economic, 9 as social, 3 as cultural and 36 as holistic. The main rationales identified across these categories are optimization, legitimation, demonstration and transformation. The possible implications behind these rationales are that libraries and librarians should be resourceful, explicit about their motivations, serve as good examples and act as change agents. Increasingly, libraries and librarians are expected to act proactively in relation to the global sustainability agenda.Originality/valueThis literature review provides a unique overview of and insights into an emerging research field, which are needed for future research and discussion about the potentiality of libraries and librarians in solving global sustainability challenges.

show abstract

Library as a consortium perspective: A systematic literature review

Cited by 11 publications

References 57 publications

Corporate governance perspective on environmental reporting: Literature review and future research agenda

Corporate governance perspective on environmental reporting: Literature review and future research agenda

Value co‐creation in cultural heritage information practices: Literature review and future agenda: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper

Libraries, sustainability and sustainable development: a review of the research literature

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About