2014
DOI: 10.7553/75-1-1275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Library 2.0 : revolution or evolution?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lack of ICT support resources, infrastructure, space for practical work by students, sufficient time in the curricula and often poor student background in relation to ICT literacy, lack of innovative learning methods, inadequate job challenges after ICT education and improper balance between theory and practice are identified to be major obstacles to ICT in LIS education. (p. 192) Despite applications of new technologies, Kwanya, Stilwell, and Underwood (2009) argue that although the form and delivery of information through libraries has changed, the basic functions of a library remain to identify, acquire, process, arrange and make available information. Consequently, libraries continue to perform essential operations such as material selection, acquisition, cataloguing, circulation, maintenance, preservation, reference and document delivery.…”
Section: Imperatives For the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Lack of ICT support resources, infrastructure, space for practical work by students, sufficient time in the curricula and often poor student background in relation to ICT literacy, lack of innovative learning methods, inadequate job challenges after ICT education and improper balance between theory and practice are identified to be major obstacles to ICT in LIS education. (p. 192) Despite applications of new technologies, Kwanya, Stilwell, and Underwood (2009) argue that although the form and delivery of information through libraries has changed, the basic functions of a library remain to identify, acquire, process, arrange and make available information. Consequently, libraries continue to perform essential operations such as material selection, acquisition, cataloguing, circulation, maintenance, preservation, reference and document delivery.…”
Section: Imperatives For the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Libraries have a well-established tradition of going where users are (Bell, 2008: 45) and Library 2.0 represents a model of change in library services (Kwanya et al, 2009: 74). Social media have changed the landscape of academic libraries across the globe.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many libraries have accepted that social technologies can help them achieve their mission of engaging with the community and have started to use a variety of social media tools to do so (Rutherford, 2008a, b). Social technologies can be used to support the traditional goals of the library -connecting users with information -in new ways that align with the expectations users have with regard to interacting with any organisation (Chase, 2007;Kwanya et al, 2009). Many librarians believe social technologies support the core missions of creating communities, reaching existing and attracting new users, opening communication, empowering users and measuring library usage and value (Rutherford, 2008a, b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%