Liberal versus Modified Intraoperative Fluid Management in Abdominal-flap Breast Reconstructions. A Clinical Study

Abstract

Background: The outcome of reconstructive microsurgery is influenced by the intraoperative anesthetic regimen. The aim of this study was to compare the impact on the intra- and postoperative complication rates of our modified fluid management (MFM) protocol with a previously used liberal fluid management protocol in abdominal-flap breast reconstructions. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed adverse events related to secondary unilateral abdominal-flap breast reconstructions in two patient cohorts, one with a liberal fluid management protocol and one with a MFM protocol. In the MFM protocol, intravenous fluid resuscitation was restricted and colloid use was minimized. Both noradrenaline and propofol were implemented as standard in the MFM protocol. The primary endpoints were surgical and medical complications, as observed intraoperatively or postoperatively, during or shortly after the hospital stay. Results: Of the 214 patients included in the study, 172 patients followed the MFM protocol. Prior radiotherapy was more frequent in the MFM protocol. Surgical procedures to achieve venous superdrainage were more often used in the MFM cohort. Intraoperative as well as postoperative complications occurred significantly more frequently in the liberal fluid management cohort and were specifically associated with partial and total flap failures. Prior radiotherapy, additional venous drainage, or choice of inhalation agent did not have an observable impact on outcome. Conclusions: The incidence of adverse events during and after autologous breast reconstructive procedures was reduced with the introduction of an MFM protocol. Strict intraoperative fluid control combined with norepinephrine and propofol was both beneficial and safe.

Moving the needle: a narrative review of enhanced recovery protocols in breast reconstruction

“…Just two groups prescribed to fluid restriction, with Hammond et al noting “judicious” fluid provisions in their alloplastic pathway and Linder et al limiting fluids to 100 mL/h in autologous reconstructions ( 15 , 21 ). Notably, there is evidence that more-restrictive fluid administration is associated with improved peri-operative morbidity profiles in autologous reconstruction, particularly reduced incidence of abdominal wound complications ( 71 , 72 ).…”