2015
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2551553
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liberal Democracy and Nuclear Despotism: Two Ethical Foreign Policy Dilemmas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For those willing to accept that the state has a responsibility to secure itself through nuclear deterrence, a situation of conflicting responsibilities and moral dilemmas may seem to follow. In particular, Thomas Doyle (2013) has elaborated on particular dilemmas that nuclear deterrence can be said to engender.…”
Section: Conflicting Nuclear Responsibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those willing to accept that the state has a responsibility to secure itself through nuclear deterrence, a situation of conflicting responsibilities and moral dilemmas may seem to follow. In particular, Thomas Doyle (2013) has elaborated on particular dilemmas that nuclear deterrence can be said to engender.…”
Section: Conflicting Nuclear Responsibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For those willing to accept that the state has a responsibility to secure itself through nuclear deterrence, a situation of conflicting responsibilities and moral dilemmas may seem to follow. In particular, Thomas Doyle (2013) has elaborated on particular dilemmas that nuclear deterrence can be said to engender.…”
Section: Conflicting Nuclear Responsibilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%