2023
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3304544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LibEMG: An Open Source Library to Facilitate the Exploration of Myoelectric Control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Correspondingly, the RMS feature (see equation 1) was chosen in this work. All data processing was completed using LibEMG, an opensource library for myoelectric control [45].…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Correspondingly, the RMS feature (see equation 1) was chosen in this work. All data processing was completed using LibEMG, an opensource library for myoelectric control [45].…”
Section: Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) where µ c,i is the mean of class c after adaptation, µ c,i−1 is the current mean of class c, μc is the mean of class c of the batch, a is the adaptation rate, α is the static adaptation rate, N b,c is the number of new samples of class c, and N c is the total number of samples in class c collected for adaptation thus far. * Note that this work was built with LibEMG, an opensource Python library for designing and evaluating realtime myoelectric control systems [44]. The code and data can be found at github.com/ECEEvanCampbell/ CIIL_LDA.…”
Section: Control Schemementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work required constant communication between different processes performing user-in-the-loop classification, collecting the associated context, and periodically performing adaptation. We aim to provide the supporting infrastructure for this style of experiment in LibEMG in the future [44].…”
Section: Future Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as our research prioritizes CNN for ease of hardware implementation, we acknowledge recent studies indicating that traditional ML feature extraction methods can effectively compete with and overcome the limitations of CNN [36], [37]. Therefore, in our next phase of research, we will conduct comparative studies between these two approaches and explore the deployment of ML on edge devices for practical performance in real-world applications.…”
Section: Limitations and Feature Workmentioning
confidence: 99%