2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1075-4253(02)00067-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Liability of foreignness to competitive advantage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, Calhoun (2002) identifies a cultural dimension to the liability of foreignness; Sethi and Guisinger (2002) put forth a lack of understanding of the general business environment of the host country; and Mezias (2002a,b) elaborates on the disadvantages presented by regulatory requirements in a foreign host country. Eden and Molot (2002) argue that, in an era of increased globalization, the legitimacy of a firm in a given country may matter more than its home country identity: they document that the early MNC entrants into the Canadian auto subsidiary had greater legitimacy than the late entrants -and used that legitimacy to keep other foreign competitors at bay.…”
Section: Review Of Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Calhoun (2002) identifies a cultural dimension to the liability of foreignness; Sethi and Guisinger (2002) put forth a lack of understanding of the general business environment of the host country; and Mezias (2002a,b) elaborates on the disadvantages presented by regulatory requirements in a foreign host country. Eden and Molot (2002) argue that, in an era of increased globalization, the legitimacy of a firm in a given country may matter more than its home country identity: they document that the early MNC entrants into the Canadian auto subsidiary had greater legitimacy than the late entrants -and used that legitimacy to keep other foreign competitors at bay.…”
Section: Review Of Literature and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, since 1960, empirical evidence in the international business literature has shown that there is a liability of foreignness (LOF) that investors face in host markets (Hymer, ; Teagarden, ). Several reasons have been adduced for this problem (see Calhoun, ; Mezias, ; Sethi & Guisinger, ) and with it their corresponding remedies (Mezias, ; Petersen & Pedersen, ; Zaheer, ). However, the main reason that has been adduced for this problem is contextual differences between home and host markets (Calhoun, ; Hymer, ; Teagarden, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study contributes to the international business literature by testing an old concept in a new unit of analysis (FEMs). Also, the study is one of the earliest to provide a conceptualization of liability beyond the performance variation between local and foreign firms (Petersen & Pedersen, ; Sethi & Guisinger, ; Zaheer, ; Zaheer & Mosakowski, ) crime within the society. This is particularly important when we consider that Hymer's initial conceptualization was based on discrimination from the general society.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some scholars have argued that the profit-related incentives for investors do not generally work unless they are appropriately combined with other incentives to improve the general investment climate (Athukorala, 2009). A similar logic is articulated in LoF literature (Sethi and Guisinger, 2002) where it is argued that a foreign firm operating in a foreign country with the inherent disadvantages relative to local firms will take a proactive role to adjust to the local business environment.…”
Section: The Concept Of Business Climatementioning
confidence: 77%