1999
DOI: 10.1021/ja990507d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Li+−(Diglyme)2 and LiClO4−Diglyme Complexes:  Barriers to Lithium Ion Migration

Abstract: The lithium ion migration mechanism in Li+−(diglyme)2 and LiClO4−diglyme complexes with coordination of Li+ by 3 to 6 oxygens has been investigated using ab initio molecular orbital theory. Local minima corresponding to different coordination sites of the Li+ cation and transition states between them have been located. The Li+ binding energies of the Li+−(diglyme)2 and LiClO4−diglyme complexes range from 94 to 122 and 167 to 188 kcal/mol, respectively. The binding energies increase with increasing coordination… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
69
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
9
69
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis comparing various ether-containing moieties is similar to that of Curtiss and co-workers. 52 We observe similarly that smaller strands, in our case down to the DME monomer, offer stronger solvation than a single extended diglyme strand, and the binding energies tend to level off as the coordination number approaches six. Our differences with the use of shorter chains, however, appear to be smaller than those of Curtiss and co-workers, likely due to the addition of the PCM.…”
Section: Comparison Between LI Solvation With Dme and Oligo(ethylesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…Our analysis comparing various ether-containing moieties is similar to that of Curtiss and co-workers. 52 We observe similarly that smaller strands, in our case down to the DME monomer, offer stronger solvation than a single extended diglyme strand, and the binding energies tend to level off as the coordination number approaches six. Our differences with the use of shorter chains, however, appear to be smaller than those of Curtiss and co-workers, likely due to the addition of the PCM.…”
Section: Comparison Between LI Solvation With Dme and Oligo(ethylesupporting
confidence: 69%
“…PEO chains are known to be soluble in many polar solvents and have strong coordination with Li + . [ 24 ] Therefore, the facilitated dissolving process and consequent higher solubility of ANL-10 in Li salt electrolytes should also be expected.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/aenm201401782mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the trend in this non-lithium electrolyte is a little different from those in the LiBF 4 One possible explanation may be that the strong chelation between lithium ions and the oxygen atoms in the PEO chains affect the molecular sizes and behaviors. [ 24 ] Due to the stronger chelation with Li + , long PEO chains could form more folded solvation conformations in Li + containing electrolytes. However, in the non Li + containing electrolyte, since the chelation between the bulky tetrabutylammonium cations and the oxygen atoms are very weak, the solvation conformations of the long PEO chains should be less folded, resulting in the bigger solvation molecular sizes and the lower values of the diffusion coeffi cients.…”
Section: Doi: 101002/aenm201401782mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the barriers for Li + migration in PEO obtained from quantum-chemical calculations are about 7-11 kcal/ mol for high coordination number [25]. Therefore it is reasonable to expect that the differences of the order of 5-10 kcal/mol or more obtained for the binding energy (Table 2) are relevant and should be reflected in the transport properties.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%