1882
DOI: 10.1080/14786448208627205
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LI. On the function of the two ears in the perception of space

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

1967
1967
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, despite being published in three languages, his work did not generate much interest among his contemporaries. Very little research was done in the area of auditory localization until the last quarter of the 19th century, when several authors experimentally confirmed the importance of sound intensity differences between the ears for sound source localization (Steinhauser, 1879;Strutt [Lord Rayleigh], 1876;Thompson, 1877;1881). This difference is caused by the acoustic shadow and baffle effects of the head and results in a lower sound intensity at the ear located farther away from the sound source.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, despite being published in three languages, his work did not generate much interest among his contemporaries. Very little research was done in the area of auditory localization until the last quarter of the 19th century, when several authors experimentally confirmed the importance of sound intensity differences between the ears for sound source localization (Steinhauser, 1879;Strutt [Lord Rayleigh], 1876;Thompson, 1877;1881). This difference is caused by the acoustic shadow and baffle effects of the head and results in a lower sound intensity at the ear located farther away from the sound source.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a transformation of the incoming sound front is necessary to localization, it seemed reasonable to assume that the external ear served as the acoustical device to perform the requisite transformation. Subsequent work demonstrated that it indeed introduces a significant transformation (4) Further experimentation showed that the perception of all locales of a sound position (front, back, up, down, distance) could be provided with a high fidelity electronic system in which the microphones were inserted in casts (15) of human pinnae A search of the literature brought to light one paper(16) which was concerned with monaural localization, with experimental evidence that it was quite good With this encouragement, we conducted experiments with monaural and binaural localization which produced the data presented in Figure 1 (reproduced from reference (15)). Subsequently it was found that monaural localization by persons totally deaf in one ear is commonplace.…”
Section: Experimentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sound travels approximately five times faster underwater compared to in air. The presence of an external ear for detecting sound (Batteau, 1967), as well as having widely separated ears allowing for the detection of time-of-arrival differences (Thompson, 1882), are adaptations that help land animals orient to a sound source. The ears of fishes, on the other hand, are very close together and have no external meatus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%