2012
DOI: 10.1007/jhep09(2012)092
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LHC sensitivity to lepton flavour violating Z boson decays

Abstract: We estimate that the LHC could set bounds BR(Z → µ ± e ∓ ) < 4.1 × 10 −7 and BR(Z → τ ± µ ∓ ) < 3.5 × 10 −6 (at 95% C.L.) with 20 fb −1 of data at 8 TeV. A similar sensitivity can be anticipated for Z → τ ± e ∓ , because we consider leptonic τ decays such that Z → τ ± µ ∓ → e ± µ ∓ + invisible. These limits can be compared to the LEP1 bounds of order 10 −5 → 10 −6 . Such collider searches are sensitive to a flavour-changing effective Z coupling which is energy dependent, so are complementary to bounds obtained… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the Z penguins also contribute at one loop to μ → eγ and τ → μγ . And whereas the experimental constraint on τ → μγ [58,59] is consistent with Z → τ ± μ ∓ being detectable at the LHC, the bound from μ → eγ implies that aē Z / μ interaction, with coefficient of a magnitude that the LHC could detect, would overcontribute to μ → eγ by several orders of magnitude [54].…”
Section: The Vector Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the Z penguins also contribute at one loop to μ → eγ and τ → μγ . And whereas the experimental constraint on τ → μγ [58,59] is consistent with Z → τ ± μ ∓ being detectable at the LHC, the bound from μ → eγ implies that aē Z / μ interaction, with coefficient of a magnitude that the LHC could detect, would overcontribute to μ → eγ by several orders of magnitude [54].…”
Section: The Vector Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These extra penguins are related to the common wisdom, that it is interesting for ATLAS and CMS to look for Z → τ ± μ ∓ and Z → τ ± e ∓ decays, but that they are unlikely to see Z → μ ± e ∓ [53]. The point [54] is that an interaction τ Z / μ would contribute at tree level to τ → μll, and at one loop to τ → μγ . To be within the sensitivity of the LHC, the coefficient of this coupling needs to exceed the naive bound from τ → μll.…”
Section: The Vector Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Although there is still a tension between the most recent Planck results on extra light neutrinos (relics) and reactor anomalies, in this work we focus on the rôle of (heavier) sterile fermions, which are not expected to contribute as light relativistic degrees of freedom [24].) Rare charged lepton flavour violating (cLFV) Z decays have been extensively discussed in the context of SM extensions involving massive (Majorana and/or Dirac) neutrinos [3,5,[25][26][27][28]; similar studies were carried using an effective theory approach [29][30][31][32], some also exploring a possible complementarity with low-energy cLFV searches.…”
Section: Jhep04(2015)051mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are stringent experimental limits on other charged lepton flavor violating processes, which can be used to derive an upper limit on the branching fraction for Z → eμ with some theoretical assumptions. For example, the upper limit on μ → 3e yields BðZ → eμÞ < 10 −12 [5] and on μ → eγ yields BðZ → eμÞ < 10 −10 [6]. The experiments at the Large Electron-Positron Collider (LEP) searched directly for the decay Z → eμ [7-10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%