LGBT Advocacy and Transnational Funding in Singapore and Malaysia

Abstract

LGBT advocacy is an emergent site attracting transnational funding from an expanded set of donor types that now include private corporations, national governments, NGOs, intergovernmental organizations and public–private partnerships. This article discusses LGBT advocacy as involving an expanded range of issues that go beyond a traditional focus on HIV/AIDS prevention. The geographical focus is on Singapore and Malaysia, two Southeast Asian countries where homosexuality is officially illegal. Alongside the global politics of LGBT rights, previous critiques about external funding and North/South asymmetries in transnational aid raise questions about its effectiveness for transformative socio‐political change, and its political and theoretical implications. Three case studies are examined: Pink Dot Singapore, and the PT Foundation and Kuala Lumpur activist workshops in Malaysia. The data demonstrate the capacity for transnational support to contribute to grassroots activism and coalitional politics. However, significant observable outcomes are currently limited, partly because most of the grants are modest, and Singapore and Malaysia's high‐ and middle‐income status excludes them from various funding bodies. Furthermore, domestic resistance to transnational funding has emerged, constituting more widespread discourses in which anti‐LGBT sentiment is framed in terms of opposing Western encroachments and the dominance of the global North.

"So What Are You?:" Nepali Third Gender Women's Identities and Experiences Through the Lens of Human Rights Development Discourse

“…As recently demonstrated in India, protests and grassroots activism succesfully pressured government officials to decriminalize homosexuality (Misra, 2009). Nepal can be among other South and Southeast countries like Myanmar, Malaysia, and Singapore, whose activists movements are changing public opinion towards sexual and gender minorities and are emerging as important players in domestic social issues despite prevalent social stigma (Chua & Gilbert, 2015;Ng, 2018). Through social activism, minority groups can hold the government accountable for its actions along with its chronic inaction.…”

Queering Repression: How the Global Crackdown on Civil Society Affects LGBT+ NGO Foundings

“…LGBT+ health/development organizations disproportionately rely on, like the U.S.' PEPFAR program, UNAIDS, and the Global Fund (Angotti et al 2018;McKay 2013;Ng 2018). Thus, these are the entities most likely to suffer the consequences of a state's new hostile policies.…”

“…Yet, "governments do not usually have health INGOs in their sights when they change legislation, unless they work in areas such as reproductive and LGBTQ+ health" (Heinzel and Koenig-Archibugi 2022: 4). Moreover, focusing on health and other development services opens up access to international funding that can then be targeted through foreign funding restrictions (Ng 2018). Regardless, the focus and orientation of the organization may moderate the association between anti-NGO measures and LGBT+ NGO foundings.…”

Social Media Roles in Spreading LGBT Movements in Malaysia

“…They work to generate platforms to voice Malaysian LGBT community, to bid their narratives, views, histories, and future dreams (Independent Voices, 2018). Chinese-Malaysian LGBT activist and artist, Pang Khee Teik, and his colleagues, organize a set of LGBT-themed talks in English, LGBT workshops, screenings of films and performances based on sexuality rights (Ng, 2018). Sa'dan, Awang & Farhana (2018) noted that protests from LGBT communities and their supporters to pushed Malaysian to stop the ban on Seksualiti Merdeka and its events have emerge more tension in the society and have aggravated protests and demonstrations from people who are against the LGBT movements.…”