2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11277-018-5702-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

LF-SegNet: A Fully Convolutional Encoder–Decoder Network for Segmenting Lung Fields from Chest Radiographs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 2 shows that for all four datasets the APPAU-Net model with the new KLTV loss consistently outperformed the APPAU-Net model with TV and XETV losses in both overlap and distance measures, and suggests that the model with KLTV loss generalizes better in multi-task learning. While both TV and XETV losses tend to lose some accuracy because of the additional classification task, KLTV still achieves good accuracy, comparable to fully-supervised segmentation models in Table 1 and LF-segnet [2]. Figure 3 shows the segmented lungs by different models, confirming the superior performance of our APPAU-Net with KLTV loss compared to the TV loss.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Table 2 shows that for all four datasets the APPAU-Net model with the new KLTV loss consistently outperformed the APPAU-Net model with TV and XETV losses in both overlap and distance measures, and suggests that the model with KLTV loss generalizes better in multi-task learning. While both TV and XETV losses tend to lose some accuracy because of the additional classification task, KLTV still achieves good accuracy, comparable to fully-supervised segmentation models in Table 1 and LF-segnet [2]. Figure 3 shows the segmented lungs by different models, confirming the superior performance of our APPAU-Net with KLTV loss compared to the TV loss.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…Considering semantic segmentation of the CXRs, segmentation of the lungs, heart, and clavicle bones is challenging because of the low-quality images and low pixel variation. Previous studies evaluated these issues with preprocessing or deep networks that involve a lot of trainable parameters, creating a computationally expensive CAD solution [23,24]. This study focuses on the accuracy and computational cost for chest anatomy segmentation (lungs, heart, and clavicle bones) for diagnostic purposes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, the first decoder corresponds to the last encoder, the second decoder corresponds to the penultimate encoder, and so forth. The output of the decoder is fed into a multistage softmax classifier, which conducts classification by using pixels (Mittal, Hooda, & Sofat, 2018).…”
Section: Segnetmentioning
confidence: 99%