2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.aam.2015.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexicographic shellability, matroids, and pure order ideals

Abstract: In 1977 Stanley conjectured that the h-vector of a matroid independence complex is a pure O-sequence. In this paper we use lexicographic shellability for matroids to motivate a new approach to proving Stanley's conjecture. This suggests that a pure O-sequence can be constructed from combinatorial data arising from the shelling. We then prove that our conjecture holds for matroids of rank at most four, settling the rank four case of Stanley's conjecture. In general, we prove that if our conjecture holds for all… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conjecture has been proved, using rather different methods, for several families: duals of graphic matroids, [Mer01], lattice path matroids [Sch10] cotransversal matroids [Oh13], paving matroids [MNRIVF12], and matroids up to rank 4 or corank 2 [DLKK12,KS14]. The general case remains open.…”
Section: General Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This conjecture has been proved, using rather different methods, for several families: duals of graphic matroids, [Mer01], lattice path matroids [Sch10] cotransversal matroids [Oh13], paving matroids [MNRIVF12], and matroids up to rank 4 or corank 2 [DLKK12,KS14]. The general case remains open.…”
Section: General Evaluationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We write IP for the set of all internally perfect matroids and F i for the family of all matroids satisfying property (i) above. The interesting perfect matroid in Example 6 shows that IP F i for all i ∈ [8]. We will now show that none of the opposite inclusions hold by providing a matroid in each family F i that is not internally perfect for any linear order of its ground set.…”
Section: Perfect Matroids: Constructions Examples and Counterexamplesmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Moreover, it is not hard to show by induction on n and |D| that M has no spanning circuit and that the last entry of the h-vector of M is at least 6. Thus M does not satisfy either (7) or (8).…”
Section: Perfect Matroids: Constructions Examples and Counterexamplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations