2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10849-011-9133-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexicalized Non-Local MCTAG with Dominance Links is NP-Complete

Abstract: An NP-hardness proof for nonlocal MCTAG by Rambow and Satta (1992), based on Dahlhaus and Warmuth (1986), is extended to some restrictions of that formalism. It is found that there are NP-hard grammars among nonlocal MCTAGs even if the following restrictions are imposed: every tree in every tree set has a lexical anchor; every tree set may contain at most two trees; in every such tree set, there is a dominance link between the foot node of one tree and the root node of the other tree and this dominance link mu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For some of the above formalisms the word recognition problem is NP-hard. This has been shown for non-local MCTAG (Rambow and Satta, 1992), even in the lexicalized case (Champollion, 2007). Some others generate only polynomial languages but their generative capacity is too limited to deal with all natural language phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For some of the above formalisms the word recognition problem is NP-hard. This has been shown for non-local MCTAG (Rambow and Satta, 1992), even in the lexicalized case (Champollion, 2007). Some others generate only polynomial languages but their generative capacity is too limited to deal with all natural language phenomena.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%