2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-00794-2_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical Stress-Based Authorship Attribution with Accurate Pronunciation Patterns Selection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this goal in mind, various techniques can be employed. One possibility consists of using only features that are obviously topic-agnostic, such as function words or syntactic features (Halvani et al, 2020;Jafariakinabad et al, 2020). A second possibility consists of actively masking topical content via a so-called "text distortion" approach (Stamatatos, 2018;van der Goot et al, 2018).…”
Section: Topic-agnostic Features: Base Features and Distorted Viewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this goal in mind, various techniques can be employed. One possibility consists of using only features that are obviously topic-agnostic, such as function words or syntactic features (Halvani et al, 2020;Jafariakinabad et al, 2020). A second possibility consists of actively masking topical content via a so-called "text distortion" approach (Stamatatos, 2018;van der Goot et al, 2018).…”
Section: Topic-agnostic Features: Base Features and Distorted Viewsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work by Dumalus and Fernandez (2011) is a pioneering one in this sense: using the CMU Pronouncing Dictionary, they extract the pronunciation of each word and transform it into a “stress string,” where the symbols {0, 1, 2} represent the absence of stress, a primary stress, and a secondary stress in the syllable, respectively. Ivanov et al (2018) improve on this work: since many English words are homographs (i.e., they have the same spelling but different pronunciation and meaning), they select the correct pronunciation, and hence the correct stress string, by studying the parts of speech of the words in the text. Similarly, Plecháč (2021) employs the frequencies of “rhythmic types” (where a rhythmic type is a bit string representing the distribution of stressed and unstressed syllables in a line) as features in tackling the attribution problem for Henry VIII .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work by Dumalus and Fernandez (2011) is a pioneering one in this sense: using the CMU Pronouncing Dictionary, they extract the pronunciation of each word and transform it into a "stress string", where the symbols {0, 1, 2} represent the absence of stress, a primary stress, and a secondary stress in the syllable, respectively. Ivanov et al (2018) improves on this work: since many English words are homographs (i.e., they have the same spelling but different pronunciation and meaning), they select the correct pronunciation, and hence the correct stress string, by studying the parts of speech of the words in the text. Similarly, Plecháč (2021) employs the frequencies of "rhythmic types" (where a rhythmic type is a bit string representing the distribution of stressed and unstressed syllables in a line) as features in tackling the attribution problem for Henry VIII.…”
Section: Prosodic Features In Aidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent examples of such novel stylistic features include prosodic features such as lexical stress, assonance, consonance, and alliteration. They have been shown to raise the accuracy of the attribution task when used in combination with traditional stylistic features (Ivanov 2019;Ivanov, Aebig, and Meerman 2018, Ivanov 2016, Ivanov and Petrovic 2015. Our work seeks to enhance this set of alternative stylistic features by exploring the usefulness of abstractness/concreteness of words and phrases as stylistic features for authorship attribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%