2013
DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2013.764879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical Quality and Reading Comprehension in Primary School Children

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
1
7

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
65
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, theories of reading such as the lexical quality hypothesis (Perfetti, 2007) claim that reading skill rests on reliable as well as quickly retrievable lexical representa tions. In line with this, text comprehension is predicted by the speed of access to phonological, orthographic, and meaning rep resentations (e.g., Richter et al, 2012Richter et al, , 2013. Beyond the word level, the speed of semantic integration and local coherence pro cesses are equally positively related to comprehension (e.g., Nau mann, Richter, Christmann, & Groeben, 2008;Naumann, Richter, Flender, Christmann, & Groeben, 2007;Richter et al, 2012).…”
Section: Time On Task In Readingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Indeed, theories of reading such as the lexical quality hypothesis (Perfetti, 2007) claim that reading skill rests on reliable as well as quickly retrievable lexical representa tions. In line with this, text comprehension is predicted by the speed of access to phonological, orthographic, and meaning rep resentations (e.g., Richter et al, 2012Richter et al, , 2013. Beyond the word level, the speed of semantic integration and local coherence pro cesses are equally positively related to comprehension (e.g., Nau mann, Richter, Christmann, & Groeben, 2008;Naumann, Richter, Flender, Christmann, & Groeben, 2007;Richter et al, 2012).…”
Section: Time On Task In Readingmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Reading comprehension of linear text includes many different cognitive processes from bottom-up processes (word-based) to top-down comprehension processes (knowledgebased; Hersch & Andrews, 2011;Perfetti, Landi & Oakhill, 2005;Verhoeven & Graesser, 2008). Studies on the individual variation in linear, printed text comprehension with children showed that reading comprehension is largely predicted by the quality of children's lexical representations (i.e., lexical quality; see Hersch & Andrews, 2011;Perfetti, 2007;Richter, Isberner, Naumann & Neeb, 2013). These differences in lexical representations of words may also explain individual differences in digital text comprehension.…”
Section: Individual Differences In Digital Text Comprehensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is possible that school‐age children are capable of retrieving phonological representations in a rapid and precise manner, but that their retrieval of semantic knowledge is not fully developed (Nation & Snowling, ). Reading comprehension involves extracting meaning from written words, which relies strongly on the quality of the semantic representation (Richter et al, ). In reading words, LSRs did not find a relation between the spoken critical word and the displayed written competitors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%