1994
DOI: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90073-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical decision after left, right and bilateral presentation of function words, content words and non-words: Evidence for interhemispheric interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
97
3
2

Year Published

1996
1996
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 229 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
18
97
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[33,43]). Finally, there is also evidence suggesting that word processing is more effective if both hemispheres have access the stimulus information compared with stimulation of the left-dominant hemisphere alone, implying a facilitatory effect of the right hemisphere's word processor on that in the left [29,30]. These results further confirm the existence of complementary language areas outside the left-hemispheric core areas, and suggest category-specific processes even on the non-dominant side of the brain.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…[33,43]). Finally, there is also evidence suggesting that word processing is more effective if both hemispheres have access the stimulus information compared with stimulation of the left-dominant hemisphere alone, implying a facilitatory effect of the right hemisphere's word processor on that in the left [29,30]. These results further confirm the existence of complementary language areas outside the left-hemispheric core areas, and suggest category-specific processes even on the non-dominant side of the brain.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Word recognition involves synchronous activation of those multiple representations, coordinated, paced, and controlled by ''convergence zones'' (lexical entries) (Damasio, 1989;Damasio & Damasio, 1990), and semantic features from both hemispheres may converge to facilitate processing. This implies that bilateral copies of the word should be more potent in generating resource sharing than either single unilateral copies or two copies in the same hemisphere (Mohr, Pulvermuller, & Zaidel, 1994;Zaidel & Rayman, 1994a). An anatomical model fitting our design has been described in anterior cortical regions of primates where pathways from primary sensory, intermediate, and higher-order association cortices converge (Goldman-Rakic, 1988).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, work on lateralized tachistoscopic presentation of open-and closed-class words has yielded evidence in support of the vocabulary distinction. Chiarello and Nuding (1987) and Mohr, Pulvermüller, and Zaidel (1994) demonstrated that closed-class words are processed fastest with right visual-ªeld presentation (i.e., primary input to the left hemisphere), with less or no differential visual-ªeld effect for open-class words.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%