2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.07.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lexical access and selection of contextually appropriate meaning for ambiguous words

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 74 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An inhibition process is responsible for reducing the activation of unsuited knowledge (Debruille et al 2008). For example, the presentation of a lexically ambiguous word (i.e., an instance of two or moremeanings being mapped onto identical phonological forms in the mental lexicon) has been shown to unconsciously trigger the activation of all of that word's lexical meanings, even when the previous context is compatible with only one of them (Ihara et al 2007). As a consequence, inhibition, which yields the selective activation of the appropriate meaning, must occur.…”
Section: Erps For Inhibition Between 400 and 800 Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An inhibition process is responsible for reducing the activation of unsuited knowledge (Debruille et al 2008). For example, the presentation of a lexically ambiguous word (i.e., an instance of two or moremeanings being mapped onto identical phonological forms in the mental lexicon) has been shown to unconsciously trigger the activation of all of that word's lexical meanings, even when the previous context is compatible with only one of them (Ihara et al 2007). As a consequence, inhibition, which yields the selective activation of the appropriate meaning, must occur.…”
Section: Erps For Inhibition Between 400 and 800 Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, our prior work (Lee & Federmeier, 2009), buttressed by neuroimaging findings (Gennari, MacDonald, Postle, & Seidenberg, 2007;Ihara, Hayakawa, Wei, Munetsuna, & Fujimaki, 2007;Rodd, Davis, & Johnsrude, 2005;Zempleni, Renken, Hoeks, Hoogduin, & Stowe, 2007), indicates that multiple neural mechanisms are involved in ambiguity resolution, and that the nature of the information provided by different types of context is important for determining when and how these mechanisms are recruited. The current study was designed to examine whether normal aging imposes differential effects on these subsystems, and, more specifically, to test the hypothesis that the more controlled, topdown, frontal mechanisms important for resolving ambiguity under difficult selection conditions would be more affected by advancing age than the mechanisms used to resolve ambiguity in the presence of biasing semantic supports.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We shall explain the practical issues affecting the use of epoch filters by illustrating an analysis of the ERF of an actual semantic priming experiment (Ihara et al, 2007). In typical semantic priming experiments, a pair of words (prime and target) is sequentially presented to a subject and a task (e.g., button-pressing) is required to be performed only on the target word.…”
Section: Actual Erf Analysis With Epoch Filtersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifty-one orientation-fixed dipoles are used for building the leadfield matrix and 12 dipoles (Dipoles 1-12) out of the 51 are selected. Note that these 12 dipole activities showed conditional differences (Ihara et al, 2007). Each of these 12 dipoles belongs to one of six regions of interest (ROIs) (right-side , Fig.…”
Section: Semantic Priming Erfmentioning
confidence: 99%