Abstract:We
report a comprehensive assessment of Lewis acidity for a series
of carbone-stibenium and -bismuthenium ions using the Gutmann–Beckett
(GB) method. These new antimony and bismuth cations have been synthesized
by halide abstractions from (CDC)PnBr3 and [(pyCDC)PnBr2][Br] (CDC = carbodicarbene; Pn = Sb or Bi; py
= pyridyl). The reaction of (CDC)SbBr3 (1)
with one or two equivalents of AgNTf2 (NTf2 =
bis(trifluoromethanesulfonyl)imide) or AgSbF6 gives stibaalkene
mono- and dications of the form [(CDC)SbBr3–n
][… Show more
“…Electronic effects seem to play a minor role in these particular cases, since the acceptor numbers of species based on the complex fragment [BiPh 2 ] + have been reported to be similar to those of I. [17,37] The most prominent difference between I and 4 Dipp is found for the Lewis acidity towards OPEt 3 (entries 1, 2), where I gives results that are in line with previous findings, [6,17,18,37] but 4 Dipp shows a very pronounced Lewis acidity that even surpasses that of a tri-cationic bismuth species [19] and bismuth cations, in which the Lewis acidity has been increased by tuning of the ligand bite angle. [18] While acceptor numbers in experiments with two equivalents of a donor are expectedly smaller than in cases of a 1 : 1 stoichiometry, these results indicate that the simultaneous and considerable activation of two Lewis bases at the bismuth centers of 4 Dipp and I is possible.…”
Section: Chemistry-a European Journalsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This parallels previous findings in bismuth(V) and mixed bismuth(III/V) chemistry. [23,24] In a similar reaction, Me 2 BiCl (II) was reacted with Ag[PF 6 ] in toluene, which gave a complex mixture of products according to 1 H and 19 F NMR spectroscopy, none of which could unambiguously be identified. While bismuth cations with neutral donor ligands and [PF 6 ] À counteranions such as [BiPh 2 (NC 5 H 5 ) 2 ] + are accessible, [25] our results indicate that [PF 6 ] À is not a suitable anion for the preparation of donor-free organobismuth cations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] In case of 4 Dipp , a chemical shift of 238.1 ppm (C 6 D 6 ) or 237.6 (CD 2 Cl 2 ) is observed, corresponding to an even lower field. In the 19 F NMR spectrum, a very broad signal at 120.8 ppm (C 6 D 6 ) or 122.9 (CD 2 Cl 2 ) is observed, hinting at the formation of a contact-ion pair in solution (Figures S3, S16, and S19).…”
The molecular compound [BiDipp2(SbF6)], containing the bulky, donor‐free bismuth cation [BiDipp2]+ has been synthesized and fully characterized (Dipp=2,6‐iPr2‐C6H3). Using its methyl analog [BiMe2(SbF6)] as a second reference point, the impact of steric bulk on bismuth‐based Lewis acidity was investigated in a combined experimental (Gutmann‐Beckett and modified Gutmann‐Beckett methods) and theoretical approach (DFT calculations). Reactivity studies of the bismuth cations towards [PF6]− and neutral Lewis bases such as isocyanides C≡NR’ revealed facile fluoride ion abstraction and straightforward Lewis pair formation, respectively. The first examples of compounds featuring bismuth‐bound isocyanides have been isolated and fully characterized.
“…Electronic effects seem to play a minor role in these particular cases, since the acceptor numbers of species based on the complex fragment [BiPh 2 ] + have been reported to be similar to those of I. [17,37] The most prominent difference between I and 4 Dipp is found for the Lewis acidity towards OPEt 3 (entries 1, 2), where I gives results that are in line with previous findings, [6,17,18,37] but 4 Dipp shows a very pronounced Lewis acidity that even surpasses that of a tri-cationic bismuth species [19] and bismuth cations, in which the Lewis acidity has been increased by tuning of the ligand bite angle. [18] While acceptor numbers in experiments with two equivalents of a donor are expectedly smaller than in cases of a 1 : 1 stoichiometry, these results indicate that the simultaneous and considerable activation of two Lewis bases at the bismuth centers of 4 Dipp and I is possible.…”
Section: Chemistry-a European Journalsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…This parallels previous findings in bismuth(V) and mixed bismuth(III/V) chemistry. [23,24] In a similar reaction, Me 2 BiCl (II) was reacted with Ag[PF 6 ] in toluene, which gave a complex mixture of products according to 1 H and 19 F NMR spectroscopy, none of which could unambiguously be identified. While bismuth cations with neutral donor ligands and [PF 6 ] À counteranions such as [BiPh 2 (NC 5 H 5 ) 2 ] + are accessible, [25] our results indicate that [PF 6 ] À is not a suitable anion for the preparation of donor-free organobismuth cations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[32] In case of 4 Dipp , a chemical shift of 238.1 ppm (C 6 D 6 ) or 237.6 (CD 2 Cl 2 ) is observed, corresponding to an even lower field. In the 19 F NMR spectrum, a very broad signal at 120.8 ppm (C 6 D 6 ) or 122.9 (CD 2 Cl 2 ) is observed, hinting at the formation of a contact-ion pair in solution (Figures S3, S16, and S19).…”
The molecular compound [BiDipp2(SbF6)], containing the bulky, donor‐free bismuth cation [BiDipp2]+ has been synthesized and fully characterized (Dipp=2,6‐iPr2‐C6H3). Using its methyl analog [BiMe2(SbF6)] as a second reference point, the impact of steric bulk on bismuth‐based Lewis acidity was investigated in a combined experimental (Gutmann‐Beckett and modified Gutmann‐Beckett methods) and theoretical approach (DFT calculations). Reactivity studies of the bismuth cations towards [PF6]− and neutral Lewis bases such as isocyanides C≡NR’ revealed facile fluoride ion abstraction and straightforward Lewis pair formation, respectively. The first examples of compounds featuring bismuth‐bound isocyanides have been isolated and fully characterized.
“…35 Analogous bismuth cations and polycations have been reported to be strong Lewis acids with applications in catalysis. [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][95][96][97][98] In a mesomeric tuning approach, one of the adjacent p-donor groups was removed to boost the metal-centred electrophilicity by precluding one of the three N(lp) / Bi(6p) interactions. 43 A third, inductive approach, has been computationally predicted for tuning the electrophilicity in these complexes over a very wide range, 34,44 but this approach remains experimentally unrealized, despite being the most convenient due to its modular nature.…”
“…[1] Unlike those, pnictogenium ions are also strong electrophiles, which can be attributed to the positive charge that attracts any nucleophile present. Consequently, the vast majority of phosphenium ions, [R 2 P] + , arsenium ions, [R 2 As] + , [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51] stibenium ions, [R 2 Sb] + [52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] and bismuthenium ions, [R 2 Bi] + , [60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72] reported in the literature are either affected by ion pairing or stabilized by electron-rich ligands or substituents, which inter-or intramolecularly fill the vacant p-orbital. These electronically stabilized pnictogenium ions often have a dramatically reduced Lewis acidity and cannot be regarded as genuine 6 VE species as they fulfill or even exceed the octet rule.…”
The newly prepared and fully characterized stibenium and bismuthenium ions [RindMesE]+ (E=Sb, Bi; Rind=dispiro[fluorene‐9,3′‐(1′,1′,7′,7′‐tetramethyl‐s‐hydrindacen‐4′‐yl)‐5′,9′′‐fluorene) were rigorously compared to the previously communicated phosphenium and arsenium ions (E=P, As) as well as the bis(m‐terphenyl) pnictogenium ions [(2,6‐Mes2C6H3)2E]+ (E=Sb, Bi). It is demonstrated that the choice of the aryl substituents dramatically effects the molecular structures (e. g. the primary E−C bond lengths) and the electronic structures (e. g. the energy of the LUMOs).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.