“…These values are in good agreement with the observed A 1 carbonyl stretching frequency of [Ni(CO) 3 (CAAC methyl )] (8, TEP=ñ A1/Ni = 2046 cm À1 )a nd similar to those of the sterically more demanding menthyl-(TEP = 2042 cm À1 )a nd cyclohexyl-(TEP = 2049 cm À1 )s ubstituted CAACs (Table 1, entries 6, 8), obtained from the complexes cis-[IrCl(CO) 2 (CAAC menthyl )] (ñ av/Ir = 2013 cm À1 ) [4a] and cis-[RhCl(CO) 2 (CAAC cy )] (ñ av/Rh = 2036 cm À1 ), [3a] respectively.F urthermore, the TEP of 1 is similart ot hose of classical NHCs ( In marked contrast, the significantly low-field-shifted 77 Se NMR resonanceo ft he CAAC methyl -Se adduct (d Se = 492.4 ppm) [29] and the 31 PNMR resonance of the corresponding phosphinidene adduct 11 (d P = 67.2 ppm), which wasp repared according to the literature [11,30] (Scheme 8, Figure9), illustrate the highly electrophilicc haracter of 1 (Table 1, entry 7), which is only surpassed by those of acyclic (Table 1, entry 9) or Bielawski-type carbenes (Table1,e ntry 10). Since it gives rise to as imilar TEP value while having superior p-acceptor properties, carbene 1,l ike CAAC menthyl and CAAC cy (Table1,e ntries 6, 8), is proposed to be an otably stronger s-donort han common NHCs (Table 1, entries 1-4).…”