2012
DOI: 10.1021/jo3002084
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lewis Acids as α-Directing Additives in Glycosylations by Using 2,3-O-Carbonate-Protected Glucose and Galactose Thioglycoside Donors Based on Preactivation Protocol

Abstract: Catalytic or stoichiometric amounts of Lewis acids were found to be very effective α-directing additives in the stereoselective glycosylations of diverse 2,3-O-carbonateprotected glucose and galactose thioglycoside donors by preactivation protocol. The poor stereoselectivities of 4,6-di-Oacetyl-2,3-O-carbonate protected thioglycoside donors in glycosyl coupling reactions were greatly improved, and excellent αstereoselectivities were achieved by the addition of 0.2 equiv of BF 3 •OEt 2 . On the other hand, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…25d Ye and co-workers studied 2,3- O -carbonyl protected glucose and galactose donors for pre-activation-based glycosylation. 84 These reactions were generally β-stereoselective, but Lewis acid additives were found to favor α-stereoselectivity ( vide infra ). A beneficial effect of a bulky 4,6- O -di- tert -butylsilylene (DTBS) protecting group 85 on α-selective galactosylation and galactosamination was recently applied to the synthesis of a series of human ABO histo-blood group type 2 antigens by Kiso and co-workers.…”
Section: Effect Of the Glycosyl Donormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25d Ye and co-workers studied 2,3- O -carbonyl protected glucose and galactose donors for pre-activation-based glycosylation. 84 These reactions were generally β-stereoselective, but Lewis acid additives were found to favor α-stereoselectivity ( vide infra ). A beneficial effect of a bulky 4,6- O -di- tert -butylsilylene (DTBS) protecting group 85 on α-selective galactosylation and galactosamination was recently applied to the synthesis of a series of human ABO histo-blood group type 2 antigens by Kiso and co-workers.…”
Section: Effect Of the Glycosyl Donormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isomerization was believed to go through an endocyclic cleavage pathway . Recognizing this, the Ye group investigated Lewis acid as useful additives to mediate α‐selective glycoside formation . When the 2,3‐ O ‐carbonate‐protected donors reacted with acceptors under the pre‐activation condition without an additive, only slight α selectivities were obtained (Scheme a).…”
Section: Effects Of Reaction Solvents and Additives On Stereoselementioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 Generally, 1,2-trans-alkyl glycosidation can be reliably achieved via neighboring-group participation of a C-2 acyl group on a glycosyl donor, while stereochemical control for 1,2-cis-alkyl glycosidation can be challenging. 7 The conventional Fischer glycosidation reaction, a straightforward way to afford short-chain, uncomplicated, thermodynamically favored 1,2-cis-alkyl glycosides, has been improved by using various acid catalysts, [8][9][10] microwave irradiation, 11 ultrasonication, 12 and ionic liquids. 13 Since free sugars have limited solubility in longer chain alcohols (acceptors), harsh conditions (e.g., high temperature, microwave, ultrasonication) are often required to push the reaction, which results in decomposition of the products, 8 formation of various side products, time-consuming separation processes, and low yields and poor stereoselectivities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[α] 20 D +139.1 (c 1.00, CHCl 3 ). 1 H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl 3 ): δ 5.45 (1H, dd, J = 3.4, 1.3 Hz, H-4), 5.36-5.32 (1H, m, H-3), 5.12 (1H, m, H-2), 5.10 (1H, d, J = 3.4 Hz, H-1), 4.21 (1H, m, H-5), 4.10 (2H, m, H-6 a , H-6 b ),3.73 (1H, dt, J = 9.9, 6.1 Hz, one of OCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 -CuCH 3.45 (1H, dt, J = 9.9, 6.3 Hz, the other one of OCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 -CuCH), 2.23 (2H, tdd, J = 6.9, 2.7, 0 7. Hz, OCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 -CuCH), 2.14, 2.07, 2.04, 1.98 (12H, 4 s, 4 × COCH 3 ), 1.95 (1H, t, J = 2.6 Hz, OCH 2 CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 -CuCH), CH 2 CH 2 CH 2 -CuCH).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%