2004
DOI: 10.1002/ejoc.200400016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lewis Acid‐Mediated Diastereoselective Reduction of N‐Protected β‐Amino Ketones: Influence of the Nature of the Metal Atom and of the Nitrogen Protecting Group

Abstract: Lewis acid-mediated chelation and non-chelation control is one of the most fundamental and practical concepts in modern organic chemistry. Extension of these concepts to the reduction of different N-protected α-substituted β-amino ketones indicated that diastereoselectivity in the hydride addition step is strongly dependent on the nature of the metal atom and on the type of protecting group. Strongly chelating TiCl 4 and an electron-rich nitrogen protecting group pro-

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the basis of this, we have studied the reduction of N-protected α-alkyl-β-amino ketones 18 leading to the formation of syn-and anti-1-amino-3-hydroxy compounds (syn-19 and anti-19; Table 4). [52] An important conclusion to be drawn from the results in Table 4 is that the nature of the protecting group significantly influences the diastereoselectivity of the reduction of 18. [53] Although the number of examples is limited, it may be safely said that with these N-protected substrates the procedure for hydride addition is less diastereoselective than with the corresponding β-functionalised keto compound O-derivatives.…”
Section: Diastereoselective Reduction Of N-protected α-Alkyl-β-amino mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the basis of this, we have studied the reduction of N-protected α-alkyl-β-amino ketones 18 leading to the formation of syn-and anti-1-amino-3-hydroxy compounds (syn-19 and anti-19; Table 4). [52] An important conclusion to be drawn from the results in Table 4 is that the nature of the protecting group significantly influences the diastereoselectivity of the reduction of 18. [53] Although the number of examples is limited, it may be safely said that with these N-protected substrates the procedure for hydride addition is less diastereoselective than with the corresponding β-functionalised keto compound O-derivatives.…”
Section: Diastereoselective Reduction Of N-protected α-Alkyl-β-amino mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Undoubtedly the most straightforward route involves diastereoselective reduction of a b-amino ketone Mannich product by employing a suitable hydride donor. Besides several methods for the reduction of a-chiral b-amino ketones, [5][6][7] a number of reports on the stoichiometric reduction of b-branched b-amino ketones (with a methylene adjacent to the amine function) have been disclosed. [8][9][10][11] These include the diastereoselective reduction of N-sulfonyl-protected g-hydroxyimines, 12 synselective reductive amination of b-hydroxy ketones with p-anisidine and polymethylhydrosiloxane, 13 and dynamic kinetic resolution of N-Boc-protected g-amino ketones.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%