A total of 104 patients aged 20-55 years, with complaints of regular HMB, were enrolled in the study from January 2013 to June 2015. Ninety-eight women completed the study. The inclusion criteria were the presence of HMB, reproductive age, a completed family, failure of appropriate first-line oral medical therapy, normal Pap smear, no pelvic pathology on ultrasound, normal endometrial biopsy, and pictorial blood loss assessment chart scores of ≥100 (average of two consecutive cycles). The exclusion criteria were previous endometrial resection/ablation, any uterine pathology on scans or hysteroscopy, incompletely investigated abnormal uterine bleeding, and postmenopausal bleeding. The local ethics committee approved this study.Background/aim: This study aimed to compare the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) with abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) as first-line treatments for heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB).
Materials and methods:Ninety-eight patients aged 20-55 years who complained of regular heavy menstrual bleeding were enrolled in the study. The TAH group included 29 patients, the LNG-IUS group included 34, and the TLH group included 35. These groups were compared in terms of quality of life and the cost-effectiveness of the selected methods. Quality of life was assessed using the 36-Item Short Form (SF-36), and cost-effectiveness was assessed according to the current cost of each approach.