Levonorgestrel intrauterine system associated amenorrhea: a systematic review and metaanalysis

Abstract

Objective Data Amenorrhea is a polarizing noncontraceptive effect of the levonorgestrel intrauterine system. Composite amenorrhea prevalence estimates that summarize all clinical data for the first-year after insertion currently are not available. The purpose of this study was to investigate the validity of existing prevalence estimates by the systematic calculation of amenorrhea measures for a general population of levonorgestrel intrauterine system users and to provide 90-day interval point estimates for the first year of use. Study We identified clinical trials, randomized controlled trials, and randomized comparative trials that were published in English between January 1970 and September 2017 through electronic searches of 12 biomedical and scientific literature databases that included MEDLINE and ClinicalTrials.gov . Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods We considered studies that clearly defined amenorrhea per World Health Organization standards (the complete cessation of bleeding for at least 90 days), collected data from written daily bleeding diaries (the gold standard data collection technique on menstrual bleeding changes), and evaluated levonorgestrel intrauterine system devices that released 20 μg of levonorgestrel per day. We assessed study quality using guidelines established by the US Preventive Services Task Force and Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Two reviewers independently conducted all review stages; disagreements were resolved by a third reviewer. Where possible, data were pooled with the use of a random-effects model. Results Of 2938 potentially relevant studies, we included 9 in our meta-analysis. We calculated amenorrhea prevalence, which was weighted for inter- and intrastudy variance, for 4 90-day intervals and months 0–12. Our results demonstrated few levonorgestrel intrauterine system users (0.2%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0–0.4) experienced amenorrhea during the first 90 days after insertion; however, prevalence increased to 8.1% (95% confidence interval, 6.6–9.7) on days 91–180. Finally, 18.2% (95% confidence interval, 14.9–21.5) of users experienced amenorrhea for at least 1 90-day interval during the first year. Although interstudy heterogeneity limited reliability of days 181–271 and 272–365 measures, prevalence increased from 13.6% (95% confidence interval, 9.3–18.0) to 20.3% (95% confidence interval, 13.5–27.0), respectively. Conclusion Approximately 20% of levonorgestrel intrauterine system users experience amenorrhea during at least 1 90-day interval by the first year after insertion. This composite estimate is consistent with the product labeling and demonstrates that most users do not experience amenorrhea during the first year. These results provide accurate summary measures to facilitate counselling and informed method selection.

Expanding long-acting contraceptive options: a prospective cohort study of the hormonal intrauterine device, copper intrauterine device, and implants in Nigeria and Zambia

“…Overall, although women's experiences varied, patterns of contraceptive-induced bleeding changes were consistent in our study with what has been reported for each long-acting reversible contraceptive in other studies. 21 , 22 , 23 In general, side-effects are a key cause of discontinuation in sub-Saharan Africa. 24 Although the Demographic and Health Surveys did not until recently differentiate between bleeding changes and non-bleeding side-effects, other available evidence suggests that bleeding changes can be particularly problematic.…”

Intrauterine Device Use in Adolescents With Disabilities

“…Amenorrhea was defined as the complete absence of bleeding for 3 months, as defined by the World Health Organization and used in many contraception trials, including a recent systematic review and metaanalysis of amenorrhea with levonorgestrel IUD use. 16,17 We considered a patient amenorrheic if they reported no current bleeding or spotting and no bleeding in the 3 months preceding the visit. If they were amenorrheic for the majority of the year but had some current or recent bleeding, they were not considered amenorrheic.…”

Seeking synergies: understanding the evidence that links menstrual health and sexual and reproductive health and rights

“…Most users experience spotting and irregular bleeding initially, but such irregularities may reduce over time, and some users may experience a pause in bleeding with these methods. [45][46][47] The copper IUD typically results in heavier periods. 48 Changes to menstrual bleeding patterns represent an important reason for discontinuation and non-use of contraception.…”