1985
DOI: 10.1001/archopht.1985.01050030075025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levobunolol Compared With Timolol for the Long-term Control of Elevated Intraocular Pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
7
0
1

Year Published

1986
1986
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
4
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1983: Duzman et al, 1982. In five, mul ticenter, double-masked studies, 0.5% levo bunolol lowered intraocular pressure (IOP) effectively and relatively safely in over 500 patients when administered twice daily for up to 2 years [Berson et al, 1985;Cinotti et al, 1985;Geycr et al, 1986;Levobunolol Study Group. 1985;Ober et al.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…1983: Duzman et al, 1982. In five, mul ticenter, double-masked studies, 0.5% levo bunolol lowered intraocular pressure (IOP) effectively and relatively safely in over 500 patients when administered twice daily for up to 2 years [Berson et al, 1985;Cinotti et al, 1985;Geycr et al, 1986;Levobunolol Study Group. 1985;Ober et al.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…Prolonged use of levobunolol, a fairly recently marketed /3-blocker, is known to be effective in the therapy of glaucoma [5][6][7]. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether the topical application of levobunol in subjects with ocular hypertension causes changes in the corneal endothelium.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 40%
“…These techniques include maintaining the patient on the minimum effective concentra tion [14. 15], decreasing the volume instilled while slightly increasing the concentration used [16], and performing nasolacrimal oc clusion or eyelid closure immediately follow ing drug instillation [11], Decreases in heart rate and systolic blood pressure for 0.5 and 1 % levobunolol observed in previous studies [3,[17][18][19] were somewhat less than those reported in the present study. Several factors may contribute to this phe nomenon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%
“…Several factors may contribute to this phe nomenon. First, a young patient population with a mean age of 30.6 years was evaluated in this study; in previous studies [3,[17][18][19] the mean patient age ranged from 59 to 64.7 years. In younger subjects there is greater adrenergic control of the heart, and even low concentrations of beta-blocking agents in the plasma, such as those absorbed from topically applied eye drops, may result in effects on the cardiovascular system.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%