1995
DOI: 10.2307/1454822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levi Ben Gershom and the Study of Ibn Rushd in the Fourteenth Century

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Glasner [13] argues convincingly for a school of Levi, and identifies possible students, there is no direct evidence that there were students of Maaseh Hoshev. I argued earlier for the possibility of students being involved in the writing of the second edition, but the only direct evidence for this is the omission of Levi's name from the second edition colophon.…”
Section: Who Studied Maaseh Hoshev?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although Glasner [13] argues convincingly for a school of Levi, and identifies possible students, there is no direct evidence that there were students of Maaseh Hoshev. I argued earlier for the possibility of students being involved in the writing of the second edition, but the only direct evidence for this is the omission of Levi's name from the second edition colophon.…”
Section: Who Studied Maaseh Hoshev?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is also possible that he wanted to give credit to students who may have helped in the editing process. Glasner's work [13] implying a school of Levi's students would support this possibility.…”
Section: Why a Second Edition?mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation