2020
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2019-3182
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Levetiracetam Versus Phenobarbital for Neonatal Seizures: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are no US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapies for neonatal seizures. Phenobarbital and phenytoin frequently fail to control seizures. There are concerns about the safety of seizure medications in the developing brain. Levetiracetam has proven efficacy and an excellent safety profile in older patients; therefore, there is great interest in its use in neonates. However, randomized studies have not been performed. Our objectives were to study the efficacy and safety of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
137
3
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
137
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Importantly, phenobarbital doses and levels at randomization were not different between groups in this trial, so differences in seizure reduction between treatment and control groups could be attributed to bumetanide. Comparing the additive effect of bumetanide with phenobarbital to phenobarbital alone is particularly important in light of new trial data showing the high efficacy of phenobarbital as first-line therapy, 10 compared with older data. 1 A significant challenge in analyzing bumetanide response in this trial was the high variability in seizure severity among treatment groups, which occurred by chance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Importantly, phenobarbital doses and levels at randomization were not different between groups in this trial, so differences in seizure reduction between treatment and control groups could be attributed to bumetanide. Comparing the additive effect of bumetanide with phenobarbital to phenobarbital alone is particularly important in light of new trial data showing the high efficacy of phenobarbital as first-line therapy, 10 compared with older data. 1 A significant challenge in analyzing bumetanide response in this trial was the high variability in seizure severity among treatment groups, which occurred by chance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…either have employed an open label design 8,9 ; have allowed subjects to cross over, 1,10 limiting evaluation of drug safety and efficacy; or were retrospective studies with historical controls. 11,12 There is increasing interest in conducting anticonvulsant trials, [13][14][15] motivated also by elucidation of unique characteristics of neonatal neurons that facilitate seizures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…50 Sharpe et al compared PHB and LEV as a first-line AED in a multicenter, randomized, blinded, controlled phase IIb trial (NEOLEV-2). 32 Approximately 80% neonates (< 2 weeks old, 36-46 weeks' gestation) in the PHB group (24 out of 30) were responders (achieving and maintaining seizure freedom for 24 hours) compared with only 28% in the LEV group (15 of 53; p < 0.001). The similar higher efficacy of PHB compared with LEV was noted when the efficacy was calculated at 1 and 48 hours after the infusion.…”
Section: First-and Second-line Therapy and Relevant Studiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…When studies are funded by independent funding agencies, we get head-to-head comparisons of medications, which answer questions relevant to patient management, for example: The United Kingdom Infantile Spasm Study study on Infantile Spasms; 4 Ethosuximide, valproate or lamotrigine for Absence epilepsy; 5 Levetiracetam vs Phenobarbital for neonatal seizures. 6 The Children's Oncology Group is a prime example of clinical questions being objectively answered using proper scientific methods with no vested interests. Sadly, most studies of medications for the treatment of epilepsy have not made any headway in addressing the concerns of Sinclair Lewis or Dr Relman.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%