2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-022-03354-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Unsupervised Learning to Develop a Typology of Residential Water Users’ Attitudes Towards Conservation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To test the influence of these hypothetical targeted policies, we developed five generic scenarios. These scenarios are not tied to specific policy; rather, they represent a generic action aimed at changing the proportion of the various archetypes within the city (see Obringer & White, 2023 for details on the archetypes, as well as the Supporting Information for a brief summary). The five scenarios are:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…To test the influence of these hypothetical targeted policies, we developed five generic scenarios. These scenarios are not tied to specific policy; rather, they represent a generic action aimed at changing the proportion of the various archetypes within the city (see Obringer & White, 2023 for details on the archetypes, as well as the Supporting Information for a brief summary). The five scenarios are:…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the “Full Participation” scenario leads to the greatest change of the solitary policies (i.e., excluding the “All Changes” scenario). In this scenario, the households that were classified as “would‐be participants” are converted to “participants,” which have positive attitudes toward water conservation and are actively participating in programs (see Obringer & White, 2023 or Supporting Information for details on the archetypes). As such, we see a statistically significant increase in the water supply ( p < 2.2 × 10 −16 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations