Leveraging the Sustainable Development Goals as a boundary object in the City of Bristol

Abstract

This study examines how the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) can be leveraged to facilitate strategic change towards sustainability involving multiple stakeholders in a pluralistic city environment. By drawing on an exemplary case study of the localisation of the SDGs in Bristol, a medium-sized UK city, we show how the goals can operate as a boundary object. In particular, we identify a pattern in which the discursive localisation of the SDGs moved from problematisation and visioning through strategising and structuring towards embedding and performing. In addition, we elaborate on the three tensions that the SDGs help participants to understand and use productively, that is, across scale, time and different ways of valuing. Our study contributes to research on strategic change in pluralistic settings, such as cities, by offering a nuanced account of the discursive use of the SDGs by organisations involved in a city’s sustainable development. Furthermore, by proposing a framework based on the specific tensions that play an important role in the discursive localisation, our study advances research on the role of city strategising and practice more generally.

Greening labour? The role of the SDGs in fostering sustainability integration within trade unions

“…At the same time, their reformist content is also not fully aligned with trade union priorities, as the SDGs tend to lean more heavily on the balanced component of reformism, while trade unions clearly prioritise its more anthropocentric features. On the one hand, the SDGs’ ambivalent role between reformist and transformative approaches could optimistically bolster their importance as ‘boundary objects’ able to speak to and therefore unite different interest groups (Burger & Parker, 2022 ). On the other hand, this discursive distance is also likely to complicate their ability to be fully embraced and implemented by actors at both ends of the greening spectrum.…”