2018
DOI: 10.1088/1367-2630/aac6f9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging the nonuniform PSO network model as a benchmark for performance evaluation in community detection and link prediction

Abstract: Advances in network geometry pointed out that structural properties observed in networks derived from real complex systems can emerge in the hyperbolic space (HS). The nonuniform popularitysimilarity-optimization (nPSO) is a generative model recently introduced in order to grow random geometric graphs in the HS, reproducing networks that have realistic features such as high clustering, small-worldness, scale-freeness and rich-clubness, with the additional possibility to control the community organization. Gene… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggest that realistic community structure is properly reproduced by the model and the nPSO might be employed in future studies as a benchmark for testing community detection algorithms. On this regard, we propose a second study that discusses how to leverage the nPSO model to test and compare the performance of different algorithms for community detection and also link prediction [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These results suggest that realistic community structure is properly reproduced by the model and the nPSO might be employed in future studies as a benchmark for testing community detection algorithms. On this regard, we propose a second study that discusses how to leverage the nPSO model to test and compare the performance of different algorithms for community detection and also link prediction [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To conclude, we propose the nPSO model as a valid framework able to efficiently generate realistic networks with a fixed number of communities according to a nonuniform node-angular probability distribution. The nPSO might be adopted, among the many possibilities, as a null model for the hyperbolic embedding of networks with community structure, or as a benchmark for testing community detection and link prediction algorithms, as we illustrate and discuss in a second study dedicated to this topic [26].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On this regard, a first solution could be to adopt the duplication-mutation/divergence model which was specifically created 64 and further developed 65 for protein networks, although a recent study spotted that it presents many limitations 66 . Another solution could be to adopt new classes of soft random geometrical graphs, such as the nonuniform-popularity-similarity-optimization model 67 , 68 , that allow a fine tuning of many network features such as clustering, small-wordness, node heterogeneity, rich-clubness and community structure. Yet, the limitation of using generative models for generation of synthetic protein interactome is that nobody know the authentic generative model behind these networks, therefore it is better to fairly compare the performance using diverse types and classes of generative models, in the hope to converge to results that resemble the ones observed using real networks.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All considered models (H 2 , GMM, GMM-LP) use for simplicity a uniform distribution for the angular similarity coordinates. This leads to generated topologies without community structure [7,46,47]. On the other hand, the considered real layers (Table I) exhibit community structure and trans-layer community correlations, which are manifested in their embeddings as groups of nodes that are similar-close along the angular similarity direction-in both layers simultaneously [14,48].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%