2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1810-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging quality improvement through use of the Systems Assessment Tool in Indigenous primary health care services: a mixed methods study

Abstract: BackgroundAssessment of the quality of primary health care health delivery systems is a vital part of continuous quality improvement (CQI) processes. The Systems Assessment Tool (SAT) was designed to support Indigenous PHC services in assessing and improving their health care systems. It was based on the Assessment of Chronic Illness Care scale, and on practical experience with applying systems assessments in quality improvement in Indigenous primary health care. We describe the development and application of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…anaemia and child neurodevelopment if they had received an Indigenous-specific health assessment than those children who received acute care (2466 client records of children aged 3-59 months, from 109 Indigenous PHC centres, 2012-14) (Strobel et al 2018). These findings are consistent with other Australian research that has found Indigenous-specific health assessments to be useful for identifying new health issues, including chronic disease risk factors for individuals and for service populations (Miller et al 2002;Spurling et al 2009;Coleman et al 2011;Bailie et al 2013;Dutton et al 2016).…”
Section: What Does This Paper Add?supporting
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…anaemia and child neurodevelopment if they had received an Indigenous-specific health assessment than those children who received acute care (2466 client records of children aged 3-59 months, from 109 Indigenous PHC centres, 2012-14) (Strobel et al 2018). These findings are consistent with other Australian research that has found Indigenous-specific health assessments to be useful for identifying new health issues, including chronic disease risk factors for individuals and for service populations (Miller et al 2002;Spurling et al 2009;Coleman et al 2011;Bailie et al 2013;Dutton et al 2016).…”
Section: What Does This Paper Add?supporting
confidence: 64%
“…The audit protocol included sampling guidelines that would assist in generating a sample likely to reflect the general population of clients. A structured process to assess the organisational systems of the PHC centre was also conducted using the Systems Assessment Tool (Cunningham et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, the significant proportion of rural research that is about Indigenous health is appropriate and very welcome. High‐quality, rurally focussed and located research helps to build the rural health sector's capacity and has been demonstrated to bring positive health service and cost outcomes 13, 14. Research that improves rural service delivery and that addresses the underlying causes of poor health can make a critical contribution to the reduction of rural health inequality, a key aim of the Australian Government.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Qualitative data provide valuable insights into reasons why SAT scores changed and the strategies put in place which may have influenced the change. Recent work conducted by Cunningham et al (18), on the application of SAT data in PHC services, found that respondents reported changes in their health services as a result of using the SAT tool and valued the tool as a lever in implementing improvement. Indeed, Schierhout et al (23) also found potential causal linkages between CQI activities and outcomes that were achieved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was designed to assess systems across multiple areas of care and to be delivered in group setting. Scores are reached by consensus with prompts provided to increase standardization and reproducibility in scoring [(18), see also Table 1]. In some health services, an external facilitator is brought in to assist with the process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%