Proceedings of the 4th ACM RecSys Workshop on Recommender Systems and the Social Web 2012
DOI: 10.1145/2365934.2365937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging publication metadata and social data into FolkRank for scientific publication recommendation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are several research paper recommendation methods which focus on finding similarity between research articles [14]. These methods include: (1) collaborative filtering [15] (2) meta-data based [16], [17] (3) content-based [18], [19] (4) citation-based [9], [10], [20], [21] (5) multi-level citation network [13] (6) and 7user profile-based [22]- [24] approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are several research paper recommendation methods which focus on finding similarity between research articles [14]. These methods include: (1) collaborative filtering [15] (2) meta-data based [16], [17] (3) content-based [18], [19] (4) citation-based [9], [10], [20], [21] (5) multi-level citation network [13] (6) and 7user profile-based [22]- [24] approaches.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meta-data based methods [16], [17] find similarity between research papers by comparing the meta-data of research papers which includes title of the research paper, name of authors, keywords and date of publication. The main advantage of using meta-data methods is the free availability of research paper meta-data even if they are published in paid journals.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One domain that is actively developing and applying these methods is the area of research data management. Possible use cases include the development of recommendation systems for similar publications (e.g., Doerfel et al [6]), the visualization of research networks (e.g., Thiele et al [7]) or plagiarism detection (e.g., Potthast et al [8]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CF and CB approaches have unique advantages and disadvantages. Several researchers have attempted to combine both techniques and generate hybrid ones to improve performance [11,12,14,36]. The main assumption for hybrid methods is that fusing the algorithms could provide more accurate recommendations than a single algorithm could and that the disadvantages of each algorithm could be overcome by other algorithms.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these approaches cannot achieve the expected performance as in taste-related domains (movies, videos and online purchases) because of the data sparsity of the preference matrix, in which the number of scholars (users) is too small and the number of articles (items) is large. Hence, current studies have focused on hybrid recommendation approaches to leverage the advantages of CB and CF approaches and to alleviate their disadvantages [10–14]. Current hybrid methods combine relevance and connectivity features to build recommendation models while ignoring information quality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%