2015
DOI: 10.2174/0929867323666151117122116
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging NMR and X-ray Data of the Free Ligands to Build Better Drugs Targeting Angiotensin II Type 1 G-Protein Coupled Receptor

Abstract: The angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) has been recently crystallized. A new era has emerged for the structure-based rational drug design and the synthesis of novel AT1R antagonists. In this critical review, the X-ray crystallographic data of commercially available AT1R antagonists in free form are analyzed and compared with the conformational analysis results obtained using a combination of NMR spectroscopy and Molecular Modeling. The same AT1R antagonists are docked and compared in terms of their interact… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…55,56,5961 Binding of AngII involves ~17 AT 1 R residues forming ionic, H-bond, van der Waals, and π − π stacking interactions (Figure 3B). The conformation of bound AngII observed in our MDS is similar to NMR, 62 flexible docking, 38 or modeling studies. 35 Superimposition of AngII and Olmesartan indicates overlap of their aromatic−acidic pharmacophore groups surrounded by shared residues, Tyr35 3.91 , Trp84 2.60 , Tyr87 2.63 , Lys199 5.42 , Arg167 ECL2 , Ile288 7.39 , and Tyr292 7.43 which validate competitive antagonism of AngII and ARBs (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…55,56,5961 Binding of AngII involves ~17 AT 1 R residues forming ionic, H-bond, van der Waals, and π − π stacking interactions (Figure 3B). The conformation of bound AngII observed in our MDS is similar to NMR, 62 flexible docking, 38 or modeling studies. 35 Superimposition of AngII and Olmesartan indicates overlap of their aromatic−acidic pharmacophore groups surrounded by shared residues, Tyr35 3.91 , Trp84 2.60 , Tyr87 2.63 , Lys199 5.42 , Arg167 ECL2 , Ile288 7.39 , and Tyr292 7.43 which validate competitive antagonism of AngII and ARBs (Figure S5).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The phenyl ring of eprosartan interacts with Val108 TM3 and Ser109 TM3 , as well as with Trp253 TM6 and Gln257 TM6 . The flexible side chain of Lys199 TM5 provides some conformational heterogeneity in AT 1 receptors (Kellici et al ., ,b); the amino group of this residue may reach the carboxyl group of eprosartan by forming salt bridges or may interact through water‐mediated interactions with the phenyl scaffold, which may explain the reduced binding affinity and inverse agonist activity of eprosartan upon mutation of Lys199 TM5 (Takezako et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ; Takezako et al ., ). The residues Tyr35 TM1 , Trp84 TM2 , Arg167 ECL2 , Met284 TM7 , Pro285 TM7 and Ile288 TM7 were not targeted in this study and are therefore not shown in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Structures of AT 1 R antagonists. Almost all of them contain three structural features: biphenyl tetrazole or acidic bioisostere (colored in blue), heterocyclic segment (colored in green) and small alkyl chain (colored in red) 55 .…”
Section: Comparison Of Conformational Properties In Different Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As can be seen in Figure 1 The second extracellular loop in the two homology models (blue and red) and the crystal structure (green). C) Superimposition of the four key residues Arg167, Lys199, Tyr35 and Ile288 (in green are shown the residues in the crystal structure, in blue the residues in the rhodopsin homology model and in red the residues in the CXCR4 homology model) 55 .…”
Section: Homology Models Of At 1 Rmentioning
confidence: 99%