2020
DOI: 10.1609/aaai.v34i07.6961
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Leveraging Multi-View Image Sets for Unsupervised Intrinsic Image Decomposition and Highlight Separation

Abstract: We present an unsupervised approach for factorizing object appearance into highlight, shading, and albedo layers, trained by multi-view real images. To do so, we construct a multi-view dataset by collecting numerous customer product photos online, which exhibit large illumination variations that make them suitable for training of reflectance separation and can facilitate object-level decomposition. The main contribution of our approach is a proposed image representation based on local color distributions that … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our evaluative framework, we conduct a comprehensive comparison between our proposed Semi-TSGN and several state-of-the-art highlight removal methods, namely Tan [44], Yang [45], Shen [24], Akashi [23], Shi [27], Yi [46], Huang [47], and Fu [5] using the SHIQ/RD/PSD dataset. To the best of our knowledge, we first propose a Semi-supervised learning paradigm for highlight removal.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our evaluative framework, we conduct a comprehensive comparison between our proposed Semi-TSGN and several state-of-the-art highlight removal methods, namely Tan [44], Yang [45], Shen [24], Akashi [23], Shi [27], Yi [46], Huang [47], and Fu [5] using the SHIQ/RD/PSD dataset. To the best of our knowledge, we first propose a Semi-supervised learning paradigm for highlight removal.…”
Section: Comparison With the State-of-the-artsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Commonly used priors include piece‐wise constant albedos [CZL18,LS18a,LS18b,MCZ*18,LBP*12], or sparsity of extracted albedo values [MSZ*21, GMLMG12]. A few works exploit data‐driven priors instead of hand‐crafted priors [BBS14, ZKE15, SGK*19, LSR*20, PEL*21, YTL20], which can be subject to domain discrepancy. IBL‐NeRF takes inspiration from the aforementioned prior works using single images, and adds constraints in the image space.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the intrinsic image decomposition has been extended to I = R⊗L +S (Lambertian shading L, reflectance R, and specularity S) recently [10], [11], [26], it decomposes an image into two components (R and L) by ignoring specularity for simplicity in many previous works [27], [28], [29], [30]. Therefore, intrinsic image decomposition in this paper, means separation into reflectance and illumination.…”
Section: Related Work a Intrinsic Image Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The original intrinsic model often approximates the reflection component to diffuse reflection, and neglects specular reflection. Recently, it is extended by considering the specular component as an additive residue term [10], [11]. The extended model first removes highlight, and is followed by the conventional intrinsic decomposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%